Skip to main content

Is logiprof.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - logiprof.lv Reviews

L

Is logiprof.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Visitor anti-robot validation

Check if logiprof.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5Google AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHA v2
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:10:20 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website logiprof.lv currently serves a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge page designed to block automated or suspicious visitors. No business or product information is presented, indicating the site is inaccessible without passing the CAPTCHA. The site uses legacy CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) as indicated by meta tags, which are outdated and vulnerable. The technical infrastructure includes Google Analytics and Google reCAPTCHA v2 for tracking and bot mitigation. Security posture is moderate due to active bot protection but weakened by outdated CMS and lack of visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement details. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is low trust and low content quality due to access restrictions and outdated technology.

Detected Technologies

Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5Google AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHA v2

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No explicit business information, contact details, or policies are available on the site. The presence of BitNinja security services suggests the domain is actively protected against abuse, possibly indicating a business concerned with security or hosting. However, lack of visible business model, market positioning, or services limits business intelligence insights. The site appears to be in a protective mode rather than actively marketing or serving customers.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site employs BitNinja's security challenge and Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated threats, which is a positive security measure. However, the use of outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) is a significant vulnerability risk. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no contact or incident response information is available. Security headers and HTTPS enforcement cannot be confirmed from the HTML content. The overall security posture is moderate but with critical areas needing improvement.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade CMS platforms to current supported versions to eliminate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

BitNinja Detected

The website is serving a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge page blocking access until CAPTCHA is solved.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

This website is currently serving a security CAPTCHA challenge page to validate visitors and prevent automated/bot access. It is not presenting business or product information.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5Google AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHA v2
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation
  • Security challenge page to block suspicious IPs

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently inaccessible without solving a CAPTCHA challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:89.149.219.49 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:212.7.207.87 ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 48 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:89.149.219.49
Name Servers:
ns1.areait.lvDNS only
ns2.areait.lvDNS only
ns3.areait.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: logiprof.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025062000, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:226ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:89.149.219.49 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:212.7.207.87 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy CMS platforms Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which are no longer supported and pose security risks. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for tracking, and Google reCAPTCHA v2 is integrated for bot mitigation. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level but lacks advanced accessibility and SEO optimizations. Performance is moderate but could be impacted by the security challenge page. The site is hosted behind BitNinja security services, indicating a focus on mitigating automated threats. Technical debt is high due to outdated CMS and missing modern security practices.
Analyze Another Website