
Is logos.net Safe? Security Analysis for Logos Translations
https://logos.netCheck if logos.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

AI Summary
Logos Group is a professional translation and localization service provider with over 40 years of experience, specializing in technical, marketing, scientific, legal, and corporate content translation across more than 250 language combinations. The company targets businesses requiring comprehensive language services and offers a broad range of solutions including website localization, software and app localization, multimedia services, and eLearning solutions. Their market position is that of an established, reliable player with ISO certifications and a strong client portfolio. Technically, the website is built on Joomla CMS with modern frameworks and includes structured data for SEO. The site uses Matomo analytics, indicating a moderate level of user tracking with some privacy considerations. Security posture is good with HTTPS and CSRF protections, but lacks some security headers and explicit privacy/cookie policies. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer domain registration information.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The company operates in the technology sector, providing essential language services to a wide range of industries including automotive, energy, medical, fashion, finance, and aerospace. Their business model is B2B, focusing on long-term client relationships and offering integrated technology solutions such as their proprietary translation management system, myLogosys. The firm leverages certifications and quality standards to maintain competitive advantage and trust. Their digital presence is mature, with a well-designed website and multilingual support. The absence of clear WHOIS data is a notable gap but does not currently impact their operational credibility. Partnerships and integrations with digital content platforms suggest a strategic approach to market expansion and client retention.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Phone Numbers (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and CSRF token usage in AJAX requests. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the scanned content. The absence of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies limits transparency and preparedness perception. Privacy compliance is partial, with no explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which could expose the company to regulatory risks under GDPR or similar frameworks. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by implementing additional headers, formalizing privacy and incident response documentation, and enhancing user consent mechanisms.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Logos Translations
Logos Group is the professional online translation service for companies. We have been translating technical content into over 250 languages since 1979.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- CSRF tokens used in AJAX requests
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
Strict DMARC Alignment
LOWStrict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings
Additional Findings
How did we do?
Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.
What others say about logos.net
Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.
Community rating
—out of 5
0 reviews published