Skip to main content

Is lombard.finance a Scam? Security Check Results - Lombard Reviews

lombard.finance favicon

Is lombard.finance Safe? Security Analysis for Lombard

Check if lombard.finance is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/asmall
ReactNext.jsMaterial UIJavaScriptCSS
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 8:17:58 PM
71
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Lombard Finance is a specialized platform focused on bringing Bitcoin capital markets onchain, targeting people, protocols, and platforms within the blockchain and finance sectors. The website presents a professional and modern interface, leveraging technologies such as React, Next.js, and Material UI, with content that clearly communicates its mission and ecosystem partnerships. The platform positions itself as a niche player in the Bitcoin capital markets space, supported by notable partners and a staking application.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsMaterial UIJavaScriptCSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates within the finance and technology sectors, focusing on blockchain-enabled capital markets for Bitcoin. Its business model revolves around providing onchain solutions and integrations for protocols and platforms. The presence of partner logos from established blockchain and finance entities suggests a credible ecosystem positioning. However, the lack of explicit business registration details and contact information limits full business transparency. The company appears to be small-sized with a focused market niche.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (3)

l*****@lombard.finance
h*****@email.com
a*****@xyz.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS, indicating basic transport security. However, there is no visible implementation of security headers such as CSP, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended for enhanced security. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates gaps in compliance and security transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better policy disclosures and technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Lombard

Description:

Lombard brings Bitcoin to life onchain, for people, protocols, and platforms.

Key Services:
Bitcoin capital markets onchain solutionsProtocol and platform integrationStaking application
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsMaterial UIJavaScriptCSS
Frameworks:
Next.jsMaterial UI
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage (implied by https URL)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

25/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'google' uses 896-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(896-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:rua@dmarc.brevo.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:13.33.235.117, 13.33.235.120, 13.33.235.22, 13.33.235.27
Name Servers:
ns-1021.awsdns-63.netDNS only
ns-1059.awsdns-04.orgDNS only
ns-2027.awsdns-61.co.ukDNS only
ns-500.awsdns-62.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:72ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React and Next.js, with Material UI for styling. It uses Strapi as a CMS inferred from asset URLs. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO practices with proper meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate with video backgrounds and multiple images, which may impact load times. There is no indication of hosting provider from the data. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from improved accessibility and security header configurations.
Analyze Another Website