Skip to main content

Is long.ge a Scam? Security Check Results - 龙哥 (Long.Ge) Reviews

long.ge favicon

Is long.ge Safe? Security Analysis for 龙哥 (Long.Ge)

Check if long.ge is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherChinasmall
WordPressPHPjQueryBootstrap CSSOpenLiteSpeed (mentioned in posts)+2 more
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 6:31:53 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website long.ge is a personal blog operated by an individual known as 龙哥, primarily targeting a Chinese-speaking audience. The blog covers a range of topics including personal diaries, technical tutorials related to WordPress and server technologies, and socio-political commentary. The site is built on WordPress CMS with a custom theme and uses technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and mentions OpenLiteSpeed and Memcached in its content. The hosting environment appears to be self-managed or on a VPS with Alibaba Cloud DNS services. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and exposes the WordPress login form on the main page, which could increase attack risk. Privacy compliance is low as no privacy or cookie policies are present. Overall, the site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms and shows consistent domain registration history with privacy protection justified for a personal blog.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPjQueryBootstrap CSSOpenLiteSpeed (mentioned in posts)Memcached (mentioned in posts)AliDNS (nameservers)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The blog operates as a small-scale personal publishing platform with no evident commercial or corporate backing. It serves a niche audience interested in technology, blogging, and Chinese socio-political topics. The business model is content-driven without visible monetization or advertising networks beyond a custom tracking pixel. The domain is well-aged and stable, supporting the blog's credibility. The site maintains regular content updates and user engagement through comments. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The blog owner demonstrates technical proficiency and maintains a moderate digital presence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is basic to moderate. The site uses HTTPS but lacks critical HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. The presence of a WordPress login form on the public sidebar increases exposure to brute force or credential stuffing attacks. No incident response or security policies are published. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The site should improve security headers, restrict access to admin login forms, and publish security and privacy policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

龙哥 (Long.Ge)

Description:

龙哥个人博客,用文字记录生活

Key Services:
blog articlespersonal insightstechnical tutorialsonline tools
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPjQueryBootstrap CSSOpenLiteSpeed (mentioned in posts)Memcached (mentioned in posts)AliDNS (nameservers)
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Login form uses POST method
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
tj.long.ge (custom tracking)
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
tj.long.ge
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a personal blog primarily in Chinese language.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=16070400;"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

85/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 61 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:long.ge
Issuer:TrustAsia DV TLS RSA CA 2025
Valid Until:10/2/2025 (61 days)
SANs:long.ge

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
9 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(2167 days)
Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:43.159.99.20, 43.159.98.20
AAAA Records:240d:c010:77:7::6a, 240d:c010:64:3::c5, 240d:c010:132:1::c8
Name Servers:
vip1.alidns.com
vip2.alidns.com
MX Records:
5: mxbiz1.qq.com
10: mxbiz2.qq.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:107ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS platform with a custom theme version 1.7.2 and integrates Bootstrap and jQuery libraries for UI and interaction. The site references AliDNS nameservers indicating use of Alibaba Cloud DNS services. The blog content mentions use of OpenLiteSpeed web server and Memcached caching for performance optimization. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with a large volume of content and images hosted. Accessibility is basic with room for improvement. No advanced analytics or third-party marketing tools are detected beyond a custom tracking pixel.
Analyze Another Website