Skip to main content

Is longsonpetro.com a Scam? Security Check Results - longsonpetro.com Reviews

L

Is longsonpetro.com Safe? Security Analysis for 403 Forbidden

Check if longsonpetro.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 4:06:06 PM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The domain www.lsp.com currently returns a 403 Forbidden error page with no accessible content, indicating that the website is either restricted, inactive, or improperly configured. The absence of WHOIS registration data further suggests that the domain may not be registered or is under privacy protection that prevents data disclosure. Due to the lack of accessible content, no business information, contact details, or security policies are available for analysis. The technical infrastructure appears minimal with no detectable technologies or frameworks, and no security headers or HTTPS configuration are evident from the provided data. This severely limits the ability to assess the website's security posture or compliance status. Overall, the domain's legitimacy and operational status are questionable, and the site is not currently suitable for business or security evaluation.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence can be derived from the current website content or WHOIS data. The domain lacks registration information and publicly accessible content, which prevents analysis of market positioning, business model, or partnerships. There are no indications of revenue streams, target customer segments, or growth indicators. The absence of any contact or company information further limits insights into the entity behind the domain.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the domain is poor due to the lack of accessible content and absence of HTTPS or security headers. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The 403 Forbidden response may indicate intentional access restriction, but without further data, it is impossible to assess security maturity or compliance with regulations such as GDPR or NIS2. The domain's unregistered or hidden WHOIS status adds to the uncertainty and potential risk.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is available and accurate.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

None Detected

Website returns a 403 Forbidden error page with minimal HTML content, indicating access is blocked or restricted.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
20/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:DMARC@lsp.com
Forensic Reports:DMARC@lsp.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.lsp.com
Issuer:DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Valid Until:1/8/2026 (97 days)
SANs:*.lsp.com, lsp.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:3.0.65.228, 13.215.196.62
Name Servers:
ns1-09.azure-dns.comDNS only
ns2-09.azure-dns.netDNS only
ns3-09.azure-dns.orgDNS only
ns4-09.azure-dns.infoDNS only
MX Records:
10: lsp-com.mail.protection.outlook.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The technical analysis is limited due to the 403 Forbidden error and lack of accessible HTML content. No metadata, scripts, or technologies were detected. The domain does not appear to be actively hosted or configured for public access. There is no evidence of CMS usage, frameworks, or hosting providers. Performance, mobile optimization, and SEO cannot be evaluated. The domain requires proper registration and hosting setup to enable further technical assessment.
Analyze Another Website