Skip to main content

Is lottielab.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Lottielab Reviews

L

Is lottielab.com Safe? Security Analysis for Lottielab

Check if lottielab.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
ReactNext.jsIosevka fontGoogle FontsLottie animations
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 3:13:19 AM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Lottielab is a technology company offering a SaaS platform focused on creating and editing Lottie animations, targeting product teams and developers who want to ship animations to their apps and websites efficiently. The website presents a professional and modern interface with clear branding and client logos from major companies, indicating a strong market position in the motion design tool sector. Technically, the site is built using modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. However, there is a lack of visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. Security headers and explicit security policies are not detected, suggesting room for improvement in security posture. The WHOIS data is missing or indicates the domain is unregistered, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional website presence. Overall, the site scores well on content and technical implementation but needs to address privacy, security, and domain registration transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsIosevka fontGoogle FontsLottie animations

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Lottielab operates in the technology sector, providing a specialized animation editing tool for product teams. Its business model is SaaS-based, focusing on enabling faster animation creation and deployment. The presence of logos from innovative companies suggests strong partnerships or client trust, which is a competitive advantage. The company targets developers and product teams, likely in medium to large enterprises, seeking efficient animation workflows. Revenue streams likely include subscription plans, as indicated by the pricing page link. The website's clean design and clear calls to action support user acquisition and retention. However, the lack of public contact information and privacy policies may hinder trust-building with potential customers. The domain's unclear WHOIS status could be a risk factor in partnership or vendor evaluations.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS, but no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected in the provided HTML content, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries from the HTML analysis. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security contact information is found, which limits the ability to report security issues. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in headers, policies, and transparency to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Lottielab

Description:

Create and ship animations to your products faster. Bring your websites and apps to life with the simplest editor for Lottie animations.

Key Services:
Create and edit Lottie animationsShip animations to apps and websitesTemplates for animations
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsIosevka fontGoogle FontsLottie animations
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

22/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:mailgun.org include:servers.mcsv.net include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:re+jpc3lgb6p9h@dmarc.postmarkapp.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 69 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1481 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:99.83.217.1, 75.2.43.161, 76.223.11.49, 15.197.129.158
Name Servers:
sage.ns.cloudflare.com
sandra.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382371552, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:40ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:mailgun.org include:servers.mcsv.net include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Next.js and React, leveraging Google Fonts and CDN-hosted libraries for performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Performance appears moderate based on resource loading patterns. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses Lottie animations extensively, indicating a focus on rich interactive content. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of security headers and privacy compliance features suggests areas for modernization and risk reduction.
Analyze Another Website