Skip to main content

Is lovin.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - lovin.lv Reviews

L

Is lovin.lv Safe? Security Analysis for rutube

Check if lovin.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/asmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:25:56 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website zvideoforyou.com appears to be a video content platform primarily focused on entertainment videos such as beauty contests and lifestyle content. The site offers video streaming and browsing services targeting a general audience interested in such content. However, the site lacks clear business identity, contact information, and compliance documentation such as privacy or cookie policies. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies with Cloudflare DNS but lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which weakens its security posture. The presence of a suspicious redirect script to an external domain on subscription events raises concerns about user safety. The WHOIS data is highly suspicious due to a future domain creation date, undermining trust in the domain's legitimacy. Overall, the site presents basic content quality and technical implementation but falls short in security, privacy compliance, and business credibility.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The site operates in the media industry with a focus on video entertainment. Its business model appears ad-supported with user engagement features like comments. The lack of clear company information, certifications, or trust indicators suggests a small or informal operation. The suspicious WHOIS data and redirect behavior may indicate potential fraudulent or low-trust operations. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The target audience is general but leans towards mature viewers due to the nature of content. Growth and market positioning are unclear due to limited business information.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak. The site does not enforce HTTPS in the provided data and lacks security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. The subscription manager script redirects users to an external domain (cr00.biz), which may be suspicious or malicious. No incident response or security contact information is provided. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The WHOIS data is inconsistent and suspicious, further reducing trust. Overall, the site is vulnerable to security and privacy risks and lacks compliance with best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website appears to be a video content platform showcasing videos such as beauty contests and related entertainment content. It targets viewers interested in video entertainment, particularly featuring lifestyle and beauty contest videos.

Key Services:
video streamingvideo content browsinguser interaction via comments
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptCloudflare DNS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 60 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
low(273 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:209.38.52.131
Name Servers:
connie.ns.cloudflare.com
frank.ns.cloudflare.com
SOA:Serial: 2378316483, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:114ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The site uses standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript technologies with Cloudflare DNS hosting. The design is basic but mobile responsive. No CMS or advanced frameworks detected. Performance is moderate with no explicit analytics or tracking services found. SEO and accessibility features are basic. The site lacks modern security implementations such as HTTPS enforcement and security headers. The suspicious redirect script represents a technical risk. The WHOIS data is inconsistent and likely inaccurate, indicating potential domain registration issues.
Analyze Another Website