Skip to main content

Is lpe.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA LP EXPRESS Reviews

S

Is lpe.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA LP EXPRESS

Check if lpe.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
WordPress 5.3.8jQuery 1.12.4ElementorJet Elements pluginEasy Fancybox plugin+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:02:36 PM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

LP express is a Latvian-based international transport company specializing in road freight transportation, particularly refrigerated cargo across Northern and Eastern Europe. The company emphasizes safe, timely delivery using a modern fleet and experienced personnel, with partnerships in Sweden and Norway enhancing operational flexibility. The website is built on WordPress with Elementor, showing moderate technical maturity and good content quality. However, it lacks privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and incident response information, which are important for compliance and trust. The site is accessible without WAF or blocking, indicating no immediate access restrictions. Overall, the business appears legitimate and focused on transportation services, but improvements in security and privacy compliance are recommended.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 5.3.8jQuery 1.12.4ElementorJet Elements pluginEasy Fancybox pluginBootstrap CSS/JSFont Awesome

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

LP express operates in the transportation sector, targeting businesses needing international refrigerated freight services. Its market position is strengthened by a large refrigerated fleet and partnerships in Scandinavia. The business model is service-oriented logistics with a focus on temperature-controlled cargo. Contact details and bank information are clearly provided, supporting credibility. The website content is professional and consistent with the company's stated services. Absence of privacy and security policies suggests room for maturity in compliance and risk management. No evident analytics or marketing tools indicate a low digital marketing footprint.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

m*****@lpe.lv
l*****@lpe.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712630****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

SIA LP EXPRESS

VAT Number:

LV40203067214

Registration Number:

40203067214

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS, which is a positive security baseline. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which could expose it to common web attacks. No visible incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness. The WordPress CMS and plugins used are somewhat outdated, which may pose vulnerabilities if not regularly updated. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA LP EXPRESS

Description:

LP express is an international transport company specializing in road freight transportation of goods with various qualifications and hazard levels. They operate routes in Sweden, Norway, Russia, Ukraine, Poland, and Kazakhstan, focusing on refrigerated transport and timely, safe delivery.

Key Services:
International road freight transportRefrigerated cargo transportTransport of goods with various hazard levels
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 5.3.8jQuery 1.12.4ElementorJet Elements pluginEasy Fancybox pluginBootstrap CSS/JSFont Awesome
Frameworks:
WordPressElementor
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.69.238 ip4:85.31.97.22 +a +mx ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 48 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.238
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: lpe.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025061902, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:134ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.69.238 ip4:85.31.97.22 +a +mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 5.3.8 with Elementor and several plugins such as Easy Fancybox and Jet Elements. It uses jQuery 1.12.4 and Bootstrap for styling and responsiveness. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses Font Awesome icons. Performance is moderate with no evident optimization techniques like lazy loading or caching headers visible. Mobile optimization is good due to responsive design. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal. Hosting provider is not identified from the data. Overall, the technical stack is standard for small business websites but could benefit from modernization and performance tuning.
Analyze Another Website