Skip to main content

Is lsbirojs.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - LS Birojs Reviews

lsbirojs.lv favicon

Is lsbirojs.lv Safe? Security Analysis for LS Birojs

Check if lsbirojs.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
WordPressjQueryFormidable Forms pluginUltimate Responsive Image Slider pluginCookie Notice plugin+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:57:31 PM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

LS Birojs is a small Latvian legal service provider specializing in legal assistance and mediation services for both individuals and businesses. Their offerings include real estate contracts, business contracts, insolvency cases, document processing for government entities, and mediation services to resolve disputes outside of court. The website is professionally designed, clearly structured, and targets Latvian-speaking clients primarily in Jēkabpils and surrounding areas. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins for forms and image sliders, and it employs HTTPS with a cookie consent mechanism indicating GDPR awareness. However, no privacy policy or terms of service pages were found, and security headers are not explicitly present, which could be improved. The contact information is transparent and includes email, phone, physical address, and a contact form, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional image suitable for its target audience.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQueryFormidable Forms pluginUltimate Responsive Image Slider pluginCookie Notice pluginFontAwesomeGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the legal services sector with a focus on real estate and mediation. It appears to be a small, locally focused business with a clear service portfolio and a professional approach to client engagement. The business model is service-based, relying on direct client consultations and legal assistance. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The website content and structure support a straightforward client acquisition strategy. The absence of privacy and terms pages suggests room for compliance improvement. No analytics or marketing tools were detected, indicating a low digital marketing footprint.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

l*****@inbox.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712640****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. The presence of a cookie consent banner is positive for privacy compliance, but the absence of a privacy policy page is a gap. The contact form includes validation but no advanced security features were detected. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The site would benefit from implementing additional security headers and publishing a privacy policy to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and HSTS.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

LS Birojs

Description:

LS Birojs provides legal assistance and consultations to legal and natural persons, including remote services; real estate, business and various contracts; insolvency and debt collection cases for individuals and legal entities; document processing for state and municipal institutions and the Company Register; management and maintenance of multi-apartment residential buildings; mediation - dispute resolution outside court.

Key Services:
Real estate contractsBusiness contractsInsolvency casesDocument processingLegal assistanceMediation
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQueryFormidable Forms pluginUltimate Responsive Image Slider pluginCookie Notice pluginFontAwesomeGoogle Fonts
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Form input validation present

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.237.98.22 +ip4:91.237.98.2 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 60 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.237.98.22
Name Servers:
ns1.noc.lvDNS only
ns2.noc.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: lsbirojs.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025070101, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:86ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.237.98.22 +ip4:91.237.98.2 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using jQuery and several plugins such as Formidable Forms and Ultimate Responsive Image Slider. It uses Google Fonts and FontAwesome for styling and icons. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and SEO optimization. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The technical stack is common and well-supported but lacks advanced security configurations. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business website but could be improved with enhanced security and privacy features.
Analyze Another Website