Skip to main content

Is lsp.com a Scam? Security Check Results - lsp.com Reviews

L

Is lsp.com Safe? Security Analysis for 403 Forbidden

Check if lsp.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 10/2/2025Completed 7:40:02 AM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website at www.lsp.com is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error page with minimal HTML content. This indicates that access is blocked or restricted, preventing any meaningful content or business information from being retrieved. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, suggesting the domain is either unregistered, reserved, or otherwise not publicly registered. Consequently, no information about the registrar, registrant, or domain age can be confirmed. The lack of accessible content and registration data severely limits the ability to assess the company's business operations, market position, or services. Technically, the site lacks any detectable technologies, scripts, or metadata, and no security headers or HTTPS information is available. This results in a very low security posture and poor technical implementation. Overall, the site appears non-functional or intentionally blocked, which raises significant concerns about legitimacy and trustworthiness.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of accessible website content and WHOIS registration data, no business intelligence insights can be derived. There is no evidence of company branding, contact information, or service offerings. The domain's unregistered or blocked status suggests it is not currently used for active business operations or public-facing services. Without further data, no conclusions about market positioning, competitive advantages, or business model can be made.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the domain is weak due to the lack of accessible content and absence of security headers or HTTPS information. The 403 Forbidden response may be a server-side access control measure but does not substitute for proper security best practices. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The domain's unregistered status further complicates trust and security assessments. Overall, the site exhibits critical security and compliance gaps.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Register the domain properly with a reputable registrar and ensure WHOIS data is complete and accurate.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website returns a 403 Forbidden error page with minimal HTML content, indicating access is blocked or restricted by server or security policy.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
10/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:DMARC@lsp.com
Forensic Reports:DMARC@lsp.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:13.215.196.62, 3.0.65.228
Name Servers:
ns1-09.azure-dns.comDNS only
ns2-09.azure-dns.netDNS only
ns3-09.azure-dns.orgDNS only
ns4-09.azure-dns.infoDNS only
MX Records:
10: lsp-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:67ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves only a 403 Forbidden error page with no additional HTML content, metadata, or scripts. No CMS, frameworks, or hosting provider information can be identified. The lack of content and technical details indicates either a placeholder domain or a site under strict access control. Performance and SEO cannot be evaluated due to the absence of content. The technical infrastructure appears minimal or non-existent from the available data.
Analyze Another Website