Skip to main content

Is lssteel.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - LS STEEL Reviews

lssteel.lv favicon

Is lssteel.lv Safe? Security Analysis for LS STEEL

Check if lssteel.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingLatviasmall
WordPressElementorGoogle AnalyticsYouTube iframe APIreCAPTCHA
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:27:29 PM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

LS STEEL is a manufacturing company specializing in steel products and industrial steel solutions, targeting business clients primarily in Latvia. The website presents a professional image with clear branding and a focus on combining industry experience with modern technology. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with Elementor, incorporating common web technologies such as Google Analytics and YouTube embeds. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly but lacks some advanced accessibility features. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and use of reCAPTCHA, but missing security headers and explicit privacy policies reduce overall security maturity. WHOIS data could not be retrieved, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorGoogle AnalyticsYouTube iframe APIreCAPTCHA

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on steel products. Its business model is B2B, serving industrial clients. The website content and structured data indicate a small-sized company with consistent branding and a clear market focus. The absence of detailed company registration or contact information limits deeper business intelligence. The use of modern web technologies and SEO tools suggests an intent to maintain a competitive online presence. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, indicating basic security awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published. The lack of privacy and terms of service pages may expose the company to compliance risks, especially under GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Overall, security posture is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

LS STEEL

Description:

The company was founded by experienced professionals from the industry to combine effort, skills and modern technology.

Key Services:
steel manufacturingsteel processingindustrial steel solutions
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorGoogle AnalyticsYouTube iframe APIreCAPTCHA
Frameworks:
Elementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Rank Math SEO
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is built on WordPress with Elementor page builder.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphoneform

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 redirect=_spf.yandex.net
DNS Lookups:0/10
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 34 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:lssteel.lv
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/3/2025 (34 days)
SANs:lssteel.lv, *.lssteel.lv

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.216.136, 104.21.93.233
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3033::6815:5de9, 2606:4700:3036::ac43:d888
Name Servers:
khloe.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
nikon.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
20: mx.yandex.net
SOA:Serial: 2374664432, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:85ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 redirect=_spf.yandex.net

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging Google Analytics and YouTube APIs for analytics and media. The site uses reCAPTCHA for form protection. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags. Accessibility is basic and could be enhanced. No hosting provider or CDN information was detected. The site uses modern CSS and JavaScript but lacks some security-related HTTP headers. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business but has room for improvement in security and accessibility.
Analyze Another Website