Skip to main content

Is ltpiling.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA LT Piling Reviews

S

Is ltpiling.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA LT Piling

Check if ltpiling.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
WordPress 4.8.22PHPjQuery 1.12.4Revolution Slider 5.0.8.5Visual Composer 4.8.0.1+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:02:00 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

SIA LT Piling is a specialized construction company founded in 2015, focusing on pile foundation construction services across the Baltic states. They leverage advanced German Bauer drilling technology to deliver high-quality drilled and driven pile foundations, including comprehensive pile testing services. The company targets infrastructure, industrial, and high-rise building projects, positioning itself as a regional expert with modern equipment and technical expertise. The website is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Visual Composer and Revolution Slider, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. While the site is professionally designed and content-rich, it lacks updated software versions and critical privacy and security policies. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing security headers and outdated libraries. Overall, the business appears legitimate and professional, but improvements in security and privacy compliance are recommended to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 4.8.22PHPjQuery 1.12.4Revolution Slider 5.0.8.5Visual Composer 4.8.0.1BootstrapFont Awesome

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the transportation and real estate sectors, providing essential foundation services. Its business model is service-oriented, relying on specialized equipment and technical know-how. The website showcases a portfolio of projects and partners, indicating active market engagement and collaboration. The absence of detailed financial or registration data limits deeper business intelligence. The company’s partnerships with local firms and use of modern machinery suggest competitive advantages in quality and technology. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital presence and compliance with evolving data protection regulations.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@ltpiling.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3716725****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. The use of outdated WordPress and jQuery versions introduces potential vulnerabilities. No explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. The contact form uses validation but no visible anti-spam or advanced security controls. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires urgent updates and policy implementations to mitigate risks and improve compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Update WordPress core and all plugins to the latest secure versions to reduce vulnerability exposure.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA LT Piling

Description:

SIA LT Piling is a company established in June 2015 specializing in pile foundation construction in the Baltic states. They utilize advanced technologies and equipment, including German Bauer drilling machines, to provide pile foundation services for infrastructure, industrial, and high-rise building projects.

Key Services:
Drilled pile foundation construction up to 33 meters depthDriven pile foundation constructionPile testing services (static, dynamic, ultrasonic)
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 4.8.22PHPjQuery 1.12.4Revolution Slider 5.0.8.5Visual Composer 4.8.0.1BootstrapFont Awesome
Frameworks:
WordPressVisual Composer
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of contact form with validation

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.io.lv ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 47 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:193.0.239.231
Name Servers:
ns-a.io.lvDNS only
ns-b.io.lvDNS only
ns-c.io.lvDNS only
MX Records:
1: mx-ig1.io.lv
SOA:Serial: 2024022502, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:189ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.io.lv ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 4.8.22 with Visual Composer and Revolution Slider plugins, using jQuery 1.12.4 and Bootstrap for frontend styling. Google Fonts and Font Awesome provide typography and icons. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a clear navigation structure. Performance is average, with some potential for improvement by updating scripts and optimizing assets. No advanced analytics or tracking tools are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The hosting provider is not identified from the data. Technical debt is present due to outdated software versions, which should be addressed to maintain security and performance.
Analyze Another Website