Skip to main content

Is lugla.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Latvijas Ūdens un gāzes lietotāju asociācija Reviews

L

Is lugla.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Latvijas Ūdens un gāzes lietotāju asociācija

Check if lugla.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyLatviasmall
HTMLCSSJavaScript
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:29:39 PM
36
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website represents Latvijas Ūdens un gāzes lietotāju asociācija, a Latvian non-profit association focused on promoting efficient use of water and gas resources, environmental protection, and raising resource usage culture. The association provides consultations, expert evaluations, seminars, information dissemination, and specialist certification. The website content is accessible and relevant but basic in design and technical implementation, lacking modern CMS or advanced frameworks. Security posture is weak with no detected HTTPS enforcement or security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present. Contact information is absent, limiting user engagement and trust. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, restricting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is functional but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization.

Detected Technologies

HTMLCSSJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The association operates in the energy sector within Latvia, targeting water and gas resource users and professionals. Its business model is non-profit advocacy, education, and certification. The market position is national with a focus on regulatory participation and resource efficiency promotion. The website lacks visible partnerships or subsidiaries and does not employ advanced digital marketing or analytics tools. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the site. The association could benefit from enhanced digital presence and clearer contact channels to improve stakeholder engagement.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity is low. The absence of HTTPS or visible SSL configuration is a critical gap. No security headers or incident response contacts are provided. There is no evidence of GDPR compliance mechanisms such as privacy or cookie policies. The site does not expose sensitive data or vulnerable libraries but lacks secure forms or input validation indicators. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are minimal. Compliance with EU data protection regulations is questionable given the lack of policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all site traffic.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Latvijas Ūdens un gāzes lietotāju asociācija

Description:

Latvijas Ūdens un gāzes lietotāju asociācija aims to promote efficient and prudent use of water and gas resources, reduce environmental pollution, and raise the culture of resource usage. Activities include participation in normative document development, consultations, expert evaluations, seminars and conferences, information dissemination on energy resource economy, and training and certification of meter installers and verifiers.

Key Services:
ConsultationsExpert evaluationsSeminars and conferencesInformation disseminationTraining and certification of specialists
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTMLCSSJavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 30 days

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:85.31.97.226
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1655882852, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:132ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS. Performance is moderate but could be improved with optimization and modern hosting. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. Technical debt is evident in the absence of security best practices and modern web standards. Modernization opportunities include adopting a CMS, implementing HTTPS, and enhancing SEO and accessibility.
Analyze Another Website