Skip to main content

Is lumiproxy.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Lumiproxy Reviews

lumiproxy.com favicon

Is lumiproxy.com Safe? Security Analysis for Lumiproxy

Check if lumiproxy.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
JavaScriptVue.js (Nuxt.js framework)EChartsBing UET trackingGoogle Tag Manager
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 5:49:18 AM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Lumiproxy is a technology company specializing in providing a large-scale residential proxy network with over 90 million IPs worldwide. Their services cater to businesses and developers requiring reliable, anonymous, and geo-targeted proxy solutions for web data collection, ad verification, SEO monitoring, social media management, and market research. The website demonstrates a professional digital presence with clear service offerings, pricing, and use cases, supported by modern web technologies and tracking tools. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and secure proxy authentication, though some security headers and policies could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, but the overall business credibility is supported by consistent branding, customer testimonials, and official partner logos. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, Lumiproxy presents as a credible proxy service provider with room for enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptVue.js (Nuxt.js framework)EChartsBing UET trackingGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Lumiproxy operates in the competitive proxy service market, leveraging a vast IP pool and global coverage to differentiate itself. Their business model includes tiered proxy offerings with traffic-based and unlimited plans, targeting enterprises and data-driven companies. The presence of an affiliate program and detailed use cases indicates a mature marketing strategy. The company’s partnerships and official designations enhance market trust. However, the lack of publicly available company registration or physical address information limits full business transparency. The website’s multilingual support and extensive documentation suggest a focus on international customers and developer usability.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

b*****@lumiproxy.com
s*****@lumiproxy.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with a presumably strong SSL configuration, uses secure proxy authentication methods, and avoids exposing sensitive data in the HTML. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, which could hinder user trust and incident handling readiness. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present. The site uses third-party analytics and tracking scripts, which require careful privacy management. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional headers, publishing security policies, and implementing cookie consent mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Lumiproxy

Description:

Lumiproxy provides a large pool of rotating residential proxies worldwide, offering over 90 million IPs with flexible geo-targeting and high anonymity for web data collection and proxy services.

Key Services:
Residential ProxiesUnlimited Residential ProxiesStatic Residential ProxiesStatic Data Center ProxiesProxy CheckerFree Proxy List
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptVue.js (Nuxt.js framework)EChartsBing UET trackingGoogle Tag Manager
Frameworks:
Nuxt.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure authentication for proxies

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Bing UETGoogle Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Bing AdsGoogle Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Bing UETGoogle Analytics (via GTM)
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:mxsspf.sendpulse.com include:spf.mxhichina.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:abuse@lumiproxy.com
Forensic Reports:abuse@lumiproxy.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 57 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.211.251, 104.21.69.185
Name Servers:
dorthy.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
jay.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mxw.mxhichina.com
5: mxn.mxhichina.com
SOA:Serial: 2378061456, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:61ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:mxsspf.sendpulse.com include:spf.mxhichina.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks, specifically Nuxt.js (Vue.js), with integration of ECharts for data visualization and tracking via Bing UET and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with preloading of scripts and stylesheets. No CMS detected, indicating a custom or headless architecture. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from improved accessibility features and additional security headers. No critical technical debt or vulnerabilities were identified from the HTML content.
Analyze Another Website