
Is lunchbox.io Safe? Security Analysis for Lunchbox Technologies
Check if lunchbox.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Lunchbox Technologies is a US-based enterprise software company specializing in restaurant technology solutions, including enterprise order management, B2B catering, multi-channel ordering, marketing CRM, loyalty programs, and open API integrations. The company targets both large restaurant chains and small to medium-sized businesses, positioning itself as a market leader with a scalable and open platform. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and extensive content showcasing client logos, case studies, and resources. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Next.js and integrates with HubSpot for analytics and marketing, hosted on AWS infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the domain registration is consistent and legitimate, supporting the business credibility.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Lunchbox operates in the technology and hospitality sectors, providing SaaS solutions for restaurant operators to manage orders, catering, and customer engagement. Their business model is B2B SaaS with revenue streams likely from subscriptions and service fees. The company has a strong partnership ecosystem and showcases well-known clients, indicating solid market positioning. Growth indicators include a comprehensive product suite and active content marketing. The company is founded in 2015 and owned by Rocket & Mouse Inc. The website's content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting trust and credibility.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protection, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which is a gap in security transparency. Forms collect personal data but no explicit security measures or privacy notices are visible. No exposed vulnerabilities or sensitive data leaks were detected in the analysis. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to enhance DNS security, implement security headers, and publish security policies.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve DNS security.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Lunchbox Technologies
Lunchbox is the only open, scalable restaurant technology solution that enables B2B catering, multi-channel ordering, and guest engagement for enterprise operations on a single platform.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
excellent
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- ClientTransferProhibited domain status
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
Complex SPF record
LOWToo many include statements can cause lookup limits
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 47 days
HSTS Missing includeSubDomains
LOWHSTS header does not include subdomains
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings