Skip to main content

Is luxdetailing.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - LUX DETAILING Reviews

luxdetailing.lv favicon

Is luxdetailing.lv Safe? Security Analysis for LUX DETAILING

Check if luxdetailing.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
WordPressJetpackGutenbergMapbox GLJavaScript+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:14:03 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

LUX DETAILING is a Latvian automotive detailing service provider specializing in premium vehicle protection and care services including ceramic coatings, paint protection film (PPF), sound insulation, anti-rust treatment, and interior detailing. The company positions itself as a high-quality service provider with manufacturer accreditations, targeting vehicle owners seeking comprehensive auto care solutions. The website is built on WordPress.com using Jetpack and Gutenberg, featuring multimedia content and active social media integration. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data, though security headers and formal policies are absent. Privacy compliance is partial with a privacy policy present but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site reflects a professional small business with good digital maturity and trust indicators.

Detected Technologies

WordPressJetpackGutenbergMapbox GLJavaScriptCSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the transportation sector, focusing on automotive detailing and protection services. It leverages manufacturer accreditations to build trust and differentiate in the market. The company maintains an active presence on multiple social media platforms to showcase work and engage customers. Revenue streams likely derive from service fees for detailing, coatings, and related automotive care. The business model is service-oriented with a focus on quality and customer experience. No parent or subsidiary relationships are evident. The website content and structure support clear navigation and service promotion, indicating a customer-centric approach.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@luxdetailing.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712957****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. There is no published security policy or incident response plan, which limits transparency and preparedness. The contact form uses AJAX but lacks visible anti-bot measures beyond WordPress.com protections. GDPR compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent banner. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could be improved to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen browser security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

LUX DETAILING

Description:

Auto keramika un virsbūves pulēšana, skaņas izolācijas montāža, salona tīrīšana un ozonēšana, pretrūsas apstrāde. Viss Tavam auto vienuviet!

Key Services:
Auto keramikaAuto aplīmēšanaSalona detailingsPretrūsas apstrādeSkaņas izolācijaIzbraukuma detailingsAuto pirmspārdošanas sagatavošana (PDI)Auto uzglabāšana
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressJetpackGutenbergMapbox GLJavaScriptCSS
Frameworks:
Gutenberg
Platforms:
WordPress.com hosting
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Jetpack formsWordPress.com Reader
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.titan.email ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 33 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:192.0.78.24, 192.0.78.25
Name Servers:
ns1.wordpress.comDNS only
ns2.wordpress.comDNS only
ns3.wordpress.comDNS only
MX Records:
20: mx2.titan.email
10: mx1.titan.email
SOA:Serial: 2024022303, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:49ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.titan.email ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress.com platform using the Gutenberg block editor and Jetpack plugin, which provides modern CMS capabilities and integration with WordPress.com hosting infrastructure. The tech stack includes JavaScript libraries for interactivity and Mapbox GL for map embedding. Performance is moderate with optimized images and responsive design. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience. Technical risks are low but could be mitigated by adding security headers and improving privacy compliance.
Analyze Another Website