Skip to main content

Is luzern.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Lucerne Tourism Reviews

luzern.com favicon

Is luzern.com Safe? Security Analysis for Lucerne Tourism

https://luzern.com

Check if luzern.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalitySwitzerlandmedium
TYPO3 CMSVue.jsReactWebpackCrowdRiff (gallery)+1 more
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 8:27:43 AM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.luzern.com serves as the official tourism guide for the city of Lucerne and the Lake Lucerne region in Switzerland. It provides comprehensive information on sightseeing, events, accommodations, excursions, and travel planning, targeting tourists and visitors. The site is well-branded and professionally designed, reflecting its role as a regional tourism authority. Technically, it is built on TYPO3 CMS with modern frontend frameworks such as Vue.js and React, ensuring a fast, mobile-optimized, and accessible user experience. Security best practices are observed with HTTPS and security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, but the website content and structure appear trustworthy and official. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is a reliable resource for tourism information but would benefit from clarifying domain registration and enhancing security transparency.

Detected Technologies

TYPO3 CMSVue.jsReactWebpackCrowdRiff (gallery)FuseDeck (tracking)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Lucerne Tourism operates as an important entity in the hospitality and tourism sector, focusing on destination marketing and visitor services. The website acts as a central hub for tourists seeking information about Lucerne's attractions, events, and accommodations. The business model revolves around providing authoritative content and facilitating bookings through partner domains. The site’s market position is strong as the official regional tourism authority, supported by partnerships with local hotels, business portals, and e-commerce platforms. The target audience includes leisure travelers, families, and cultural tourists. The digital presence indicates a mature marketing ecosystem with integrated tracking and analytics tools. Growth opportunities lie in expanding digital services and improving direct engagement channels.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

l*****@luzern.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers, and secure form implementations including CAPTCHA. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness perception. The use of third-party tracking scripts like FuseDeck requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate privacy and security risks. Overall, the site is secure but could improve by publishing explicit security governance documents and incident response information to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Verify and publish domain registration details to improve legitimacy and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Lucerne Tourism

Description:

Official tourism guide for the city of Lucerne and the Lake Lucerne region, offering information on sights, events, accommodations, excursions, and travel planning.

Key Services:
Tourism informationEvent calendarAccommodation booking linksExcursion and activity guidesTravel planning resources
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
TYPO3 CMSVue.jsReactWebpackCrowdRiff (gallery)FuseDeck (tracking)
Frameworks:
TYPO3 CMS
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CAPTCHA in forms

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
FuseDeck
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
FuseDeck
Marketing Tools:
FuseDeck
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional tourism guide for Lucerne region.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

7/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:193.41.148.82 ip4:78.46.4.123 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:spf.protection.cyon.net include:spf.cs2.ch include:spf.mailjet.com include:marketing.dynamics.com include:spf.abacuscity.ch include:smtp.neusta-is.de -all
DNS Lookups:8/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@luzern.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 77 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:luzern.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:12/20/2025 (77 days)
SANs:luzern.com, *.luzern.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
28 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1436 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:104.20.25.50, 172.66.154.47
AAAA Records:2606:4700:10::ac42:9a2f, 2606:4700:10::6814:1932
Name Servers:
beth.ns.cloudflare.com
kyrie.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
0: luzern-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2384284990, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:81ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:193.41.148.82 ip4:78.46.4.123 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:spf.protection.cyon.net include:spf.cs2.ch include:spf.mailjet.com include:marketing.dynamics.com include:spf.abacuscity.ch include:smtp.neusta-is.de -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website leverages TYPO3 CMS, a robust open-source content management system, combined with modern JavaScript frameworks Vue.js and React for dynamic frontend components. The infrastructure supports fast loading times and excellent mobile responsiveness. The site uses Webpack for module bundling and integrates third-party services such as CrowdRiff for gallery management and FuseDeck for tracking and analytics. Accessibility features and SEO optimizations are well implemented, contributing to a high-quality user experience. No significant technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Hosting details are not explicitly identified but the site uses HTTPS with strong security headers, indicating a professionally managed environment.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about luzern.com

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website