Skip to main content

Is lwc.dev a Scam? Security Check Results - Salesforce.com, Inc. Reviews

lwc.dev favicon

Is lwc.dev Safe? Security Analysis for Salesforce.com, Inc.

Check if lwc.dev is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statesenterprise
HTML5CSS3JavaScript ES6+Web ComponentsAlgolia DocSearch+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 6:21:41 AM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Lightning Web Components (LWC) is an open source web components framework developed and maintained by Salesforce.com, Inc., a leading enterprise technology company. The website serves as a comprehensive documentation and resource portal for developers to learn and implement LWC, emphasizing performance, standards compliance, and ease of use. The site is well-branded, professionally designed, and targets developers and enterprises building modern web applications. The business model centers on open source community engagement supported by Salesforce's enterprise ecosystem. Technically, the website leverages modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and ES6+ JavaScript, with integrations such as Algolia DocSearch for search functionality and OneTrust for cookie consent management. Hosting is provided by Salesforce infrastructure, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. The site demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and implements a robust cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. While explicit security headers and policies are not visible in the HTML, no vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data confirms the domain is registered to Salesforce, aligning with the website content and branding, indicating high legitimacy. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit security and incident response policies, adding a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosures, and providing clearer contact information for security and business inquiries.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScript ES6+Web ComponentsAlgolia DocSearchOneTrust Cookie Consent

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Salesforce's LWC framework positions itself as a modern, standards-based solution for enterprise-grade web components, leveraging Salesforce's strong market presence and developer community. The open source approach fosters community contributions and roadmap influence. The business benefits from Salesforce's brand trust, extensive developer ecosystem, and integration with its broader cloud offerings. The website supports this by providing detailed guides, community links, and source code access via GitHub. The absence of direct contact information suggests a focus on self-service developer engagement rather than direct sales through this site. The marketing ecosystem includes Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user insights, balanced with GDPR-compliant cookie consent. The company maintains a consistent branding strategy and leverages partnerships within the Salesforce ecosystem. Growth indicators include active GitHub repositories and community engagement. The site’s technical infrastructure supports scalability and performance, critical for enterprise adoption.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. No exposed credentials, vulnerable libraries, or insecure forms were identified. However, the absence of explicit security headers in the HTML and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the business identity, reducing risk of domain spoofing or fraud. The site does not appear to be behind a WAF or present any blocking challenges, indicating open accessibility. Compliance with privacy regulations is evident through the privacy policy and cookie consent manager. The lack of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy may limit external security researcher engagement. Overall, the security risk is low but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance documentation and contact channels.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Salesforce.com, Inc.

Description:

Lightning Web Components is a blazing fast, enterprise-grade web components foundation developed by Salesforce. It enables building fast, versatile web components and apps using modern JavaScript and web standards.

Key Services:
Lightning Web Components frameworkDeveloper guides and documentationOpen source community engagement
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScript ES6+Web ComponentsAlgolia DocSearchOneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks:
Lightning Web ComponentsOneTrust Consent SDK
Platforms:
GitHubSalesforce Cloud Hosting
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a technical documentation portal for Lightning Web Components by Salesforce.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 -all heroku-domain-verification=6ytkkzlfdqdkvfrl5v9kltjubs3fsqbrcku7aeioi3m
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 82 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:35.174.227.188, 54.152.15.201
Name Servers:
dns1.p09.nsone.netDNS only
dns2.p09.nsone.netDNS only
dns3.p09.nsone.netDNS only
dns4.p09.nsone.netDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1702672428, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:117ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 -all heroku-domain-verification=6ytkkzlfdqdkvfrl5v9kltjubs3fsqbrcku7aeioi3m

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including Lightning Web Components, leveraging native web standards for performance and compatibility. It integrates third-party services such as Algolia for search and OneTrust for cookie consent management, indicating a mature approach to user experience and compliance. Hosting on Salesforce infrastructure ensures reliability and speed. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with clean semantic HTML and CSS. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. Performance is fast with minimal external dependencies. Technical risks are minimal but could be mitigated further by adding explicit security headers and formalizing security documentation.
Analyze Another Website