Is m-gs.kr Safe? Security Analysis for GS Retail Home Shopping
Check if m-gs.kr is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
GS Retail Home Shopping is a South Korean retail company specializing in home shopping services, with a domain registered since 2007 indicating an established presence. The website content is extremely minimal, consisting only of the domain name text, suggesting the site is either a placeholder or under development. There is no metadata, structured data, or interactive elements present, which limits the digital maturity and user engagement capabilities. The WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the business identity, showing no privacy protection and full registrant details, which supports legitimacy. Technically, the website lacks modern infrastructure indicators such as HTTPS, security headers, or any detectable CMS or frameworks. The absence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies indicates poor compliance with data protection regulations. No contact forms or social media links are present, limiting user interaction and trust signals. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS and security headers, exposing the site to potential risks. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile due to minimal content and no suspicious elements, but it suffers from poor technical implementation and lack of compliance features. Strategic improvements in security, privacy policies, and content development are recommended to enhance trustworthiness and user experience.
π§ AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
GS Retail Home Shopping operates in the retail sector in South Korea, focusing on home shopping services. The domain age and registrant information indicate a stable and legitimate business. However, the website itself lacks content and digital maturity, which may impact customer engagement and brand perception. The absence of marketing, analytics, or advertising tools suggests limited online commercial activity or an incomplete web presence. The company likely relies on other channels or platforms for customer interaction. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries linked via the website. The business model appears to be traditional retail with a home shopping focus, targeting a general consumer audience in South Korea.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Phone Numbers (1)
Physical Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The current security posture of the website is weak. The site lacks HTTPS, exposing users to potential interception risks. No security headers are present to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and similar regulations. No incident response or security contact information is published, limiting transparency and readiness. The minimal content reduces attack surface but also indicates a lack of security best practices implementation. Overall, the site requires urgent improvements in SSL deployment, security headers, and privacy compliance to meet modern security standards.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user connections.
β¨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
GS Retail Home Shopping
GS Retail Home Shopping is a retail company operating in South Korea, likely focused on home shopping services and retail sales.
poor
Technical Stack
poor
Security Assessment
0Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website content is extremely minimal, only displaying the domain name in body
π‘οΈSecurity Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
π€GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Insufficient contact information
MEDIUMGDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details
GDPR Compliance Analysis
π‘οΈNIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
π§Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
No email authentication configured
CRITICALDomain is vulnerable to email spoofing
πSSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
πDNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
β‘Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
π§Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings