Skip to main content

Is macleanfoggcs.com a Scam? Security Check Results - MacLean-Fogg Component Solutions Reviews

M

Is macleanfoggcs.com Safe? Security Analysis for MacLean-Fogg Component Solutions

Check if macleanfoggcs.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingUnited Stateslarge
jQueryGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarASP.NET WebForms
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 4:18:40 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

MacLean-Fogg Component Solutions is a well-established manufacturing company specializing in fastener components, engineered components, and engineered plastics. The company serves diverse industries including automotive, heavy-duty trucks, and industrial sectors, positioning itself as a leading supplier with a global footprint and nearly $900 million in annual sales. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image aligned with its business focus. Technically, the site uses an ASP.NET WebForms framework with common analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Hotjar, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure, though some improvements are recommended in security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable anomaly that slightly reduces trust but does not outweigh the professional presentation and clear contact information. Overall, the website is functional, business-appropriate, and safe for general audiences.

Detected Technologies

jQueryGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarASP.NET WebForms

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on engineered fasteners and plastics, targeting B2B clients in automotive and industrial markets. Its business model centers on value-added engineered solutions with a strong emphasis on operational excellence and innovation. The presence of multiple subsidiaries and global locations indicates a large enterprise scale. Awards and certifications mentioned on the site enhance its market credibility. The partnership with a professional web design firm and use of advanced analytics tools suggest a commitment to maintaining a competitive digital presence. However, the lack of visible security policies and incident response contacts may indicate areas for operational improvement.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@macleanfogg.com

Phone Numbers (1)

847*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a solid baseline security posture with HTTPS and no evident exposure of sensitive information. Use of Google Tag Manager and Hotjar introduces third-party tracking which should be monitored for compliance. The absence of explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are gaps that could be exploited or lead to compliance issues, especially under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness perception. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended best practices and formal policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

MacLean-Fogg Component Solutions

Description:

MacLean-Fogg Component Solutions is a leading supplier of Fastener Components, Engineered Components, and Engineered Plastics serving many diverse industries.

Key Services:
Fastener ComponentsEngineered ComponentsEngineered Plastics
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarASP.NET WebForms
Frameworks:
ASP.NET
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Hotjar for analytics

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHotjar
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Hotjar
Marketing Tools:
Hotjar
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphoneform

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

5 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:12.53.28.85
Name Servers:
randall.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
tani.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2382441559, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:51ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on ASP.NET WebForms technology, utilizing jQuery and several third-party analytics and tracking scripts including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Hotjar. The site uses a custom CMS likely integrated with ASP.NET. Performance is moderate with some room for improvement in mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO is adequately addressed with meta descriptions and structured navigation. The site lacks modern security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Analyze Another Website