Skip to main content

Is magic.link a Scam? Security Check Results - Magic Labs, Inc. Reviews

M

Is magic.link Safe? Security Analysis for Magic Labs, Inc.

Check if magic.link is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statesmedium
ReactNext.jsGoogle Tag ManagerHubSpot AnalyticsMicrosoft Clarity+4 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 2:40:16 PM
77
Security Score
LOW RISK

AI Summary

Magic Labs, Inc. is a technology company specializing in blockchain developer tools, focusing on wallet abstraction and onchain application development. Founded in 2018 and based in San Francisco, Magic Labs has established itself as a pioneer in simplifying blockchain wallet integration, serving over 190,000 developers and onboarding 40 million users. Their offerings include embedded wallets, API wallets, and the Newton platform for enhanced crypto user experience. The company is backed by prominent venture capital firms and emphasizes security and compliance with certifications such as SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001:2022. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks like React and Next.js, with integrations for analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, HubSpot, Microsoft Clarity, and Clearbit. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security best practices are evident, including HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms. The security posture is strong, with no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the site lacks a dedicated incident response or vulnerability disclosure page, which could enhance transparency and trust. Privacy compliance is robust, with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. Contact information is available primarily through forms and physical address, but no direct emails or phone numbers are published. Overall, Magic Labs presents a professional, trustworthy, and secure online presence aligned with its business objectives. Strategic recommendations include publishing incident response details, adding a security.txt file, and providing Data Protection Officer contact information to further strengthen security and compliance transparency.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsGoogle Tag ManagerHubSpot AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityTypeformOneTrust Cookie ConsentClearbit RevealHubble SDK

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Magic Labs operates in the blockchain technology sector, targeting developers and enterprises building onchain applications. Their business model is B2B SaaS, offering APIs and embedded wallet solutions that abstract blockchain complexity. The company holds a strong market position as an innovator and leader in wallet abstraction, supported by significant venture capital investments. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees and usage-based pricing for their developer tools. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with major blockchain projects and developer communities. Growth indicators include a large user base and developer trust. The company maintains a consistent brand and professional content, reinforcing credibility and market presence.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Magic Labs demonstrates a mature security posture with adherence to industry standards such as SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, HIPAA, CCPA, and GDPR. The website enforces HTTPS, employs security headers, and integrates cookie consent mechanisms. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. However, the absence of a public incident response page and security.txt file indicates room for improvement in transparency and vulnerability management. Data protection practices appear strong, but explicit contact channels for security incidents are not published. Overall, the security culture is positive, reflecting the company's commitment to secure scalability and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated incident response page with clear contact channels for security issues.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Magic Labs, Inc.

Description:

Magic Labs provides developer tools and infrastructure to simplify blockchain wallet integration and onchain development. They have onboarded 40 million users and are trusted by over 190,000 developers.

Key Services:
Wallet abstractionEmbedded walletsAPI walletsNewton platform for crypto UX
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsGoogle Tag ManagerHubSpot AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityTypeformOneTrust Cookie ConsentClearbit RevealHubble SDK
Frameworks:
Next.jsReact
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Use of security certifications
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with HubSpot integration

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHubSpot AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityLinkedIn Insight TagClearbit Reveal
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Twitter Ads
Tracking Pixels:
HubSpot AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityLinkedIn Insight TagClearbit Reveal
Marketing Tools:
HubSpotTypeform
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

95/100
Score

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

80/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:email.chargebee.com include:spf.mtasv.net include:sendgrid.net include:stspg-customer.com include:20846682.spf10.hubspotemail.net -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy: none
Aggregate Reports:postmaster@magic.link
Forensic Reports:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 34 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(340 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
julissa.ns.cloudflare.com
seth.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:email.chargebee.com include:spf.mtasv.net include:sendgrid.net include:stspg-customer.com include:20846682.spf10.hubspotemail.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React and Next.js, ensuring fast performance and good SEO optimization. Integration with multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, HubSpot, Microsoft Clarity, and Clearbit indicates a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with no broken elements detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified, but the presence of Google Tag Manager and CDN usage suggests a reliable hosting environment. Technical risks are minimal, with no outdated or vulnerable libraries detected. Opportunities exist to improve transparency around security incident handling and vulnerability disclosure.
Analyze Another Website