Skip to main content

Is mailigen.com a Scam? Security Check Results - mailigen.com Reviews

M

Is mailigen.com Safe? Security Analysis for mailigen.com

Check if mailigen.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
JavaScript
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 4:01:40 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at mailigen.com/lander currently serves as a minimal placeholder or parking page with very limited content. There is no visible business information, contact details, or policies presented on the page. The domain is registered with GoDaddy since 2009, indicating a long-standing registration, but the website itself does not reflect an active or mature digital presence. The technical infrastructure includes JavaScript and Google Adsense scripts, but lacks modern SEO, accessibility, and security features. No forms or user interaction elements are present. From a security perspective, the site does not display HTTPS status or security headers in the provided data, and DNSSEC is not enabled. There are no visible privacy or cookie policies, nor any incident response or security contact information. This indicates a low security maturity level and potential compliance gaps, especially regarding GDPR and data protection regulations. Overall, the website's risk profile is moderate due to minimal content and lack of security best practices. The domain registration is legitimate and consistent, but the website itself does not provide sufficient information to assess business credibility or compliance. Strategic improvements are needed to enhance security posture, privacy compliance, and user trust.

Detected Technologies

JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the minimal content and lack of business information on the landing page, detailed business intelligence is limited. The domain mailigen.com suggests association with email marketing or related services, but no explicit business description, services, or market positioning is provided. The domain age indicates a potentially established business, but the current website state does not reflect active operations or customer engagement. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent company information is available. The absence of contact details and policies further limits business intelligence insights.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website is weak based on the available data. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, and DNSSEC is not enabled for the domain. No security policies, incident response contacts, or certifications are presented. The presence of Google Adsense scripts indicates some advertising activity but no advanced security or privacy controls. The lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Overall, the site requires significant improvements in security configuration and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Adsense
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and appears to be a placeholder or parking page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
16 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(348 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:3.33.130.190, 15.197.148.33
Name Servers:
ns37.domaincontrol.com
ns38.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2024050701, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:179ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses JavaScript and loads external scripts from Google Adsense and wsimg.com. The hosting provider is GoDaddy.com, LLC, as indicated by the domain registrar. The HTML content is minimal with no metadata such as Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. There are no forms or interactive elements. The site appears to be a placeholder or parking page with limited SEO and accessibility features. Performance is likely moderate given the minimal content, but mobile optimization and navigation clarity are basic at best. No CMS or frameworks are detected.
Analyze Another Website