Skip to main content

Is maitlandlatvia.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Maitland® Latvia Reviews

maitlandlatvia.lv favicon

Is maitlandlatvia.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Maitland® Latvia

Check if maitlandlatvia.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationLatviasmall
WordPressCMP – Coming Soon Maintenance PluginFont AwesomeGoogle FontsFetch API
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:07:33 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Maitland® Latvia is a small educational website focused on providing training courses for physiotherapists, with course registrations opening in 2026. The website content is minimal, serving primarily as a landing page with basic branding and a background image. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress, utilizing a coming soon maintenance plugin, Google Fonts, and Font Awesome for styling. The site is accessible and mobile-optimized to a basic degree but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no visible security headers or policies. No WHOIS data was retrievable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site appears to be in early development or pre-launch phase with limited business and compliance information available.

Detected Technologies

WordPressCMP – Coming Soon Maintenance PluginFont AwesomeGoogle FontsFetch API

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business targets physiotherapists in Latvia, offering educational courses. The business model is education/training, likely relying on course fees. Market positioning is not explicitly stated, and no competitive or partnership information is provided. The website lacks contact details, privacy policies, or certifications, which limits trust and credibility. The minimal content and delayed course registration suggest a startup or pre-launch phase. No analytics or marketing tools are detected, indicating low digital marketing maturity.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS but lacks security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating poor GDPR compliance. The subscription form uses AJAX with basic validation but no visible CAPTCHA or advanced anti-bot measures. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain trust evaluation. Overall, the security posture is basic with room for significant improvement in compliance and protection.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Maitland® Latvia

Description:

Apmācības fizioterapeitiem

Key Services:
courses for physiotherapists
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressCMP – Coming Soon Maintenance PluginFont AwesomeGoogle FontsFetch API
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URLs)

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a minimal landing page announcing upcoming course registrations in 2026.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Cloudflare, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.alwaysdata.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 69 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:maitlandlatvia.lv
Issuer:R11
Valid Until:10/8/2025 (69 days)
SANs:maitlandlatvia.lv

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:185.31.40.13
AAAA Records:2a00:b6e0:1:20:4::1
Name Servers:
dns1.alwaysdata.comDNS only
dns2.alwaysdata.comDNS only
MX Records:
20: mx2.alwaysdata.com
10: mx1.alwaysdata.com
SOA:Serial: 1752132741, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:98ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.alwaysdata.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with a coming soon plugin, using external resources like Google Fonts and Font Awesome. The site loads a background image and minimal text content. The AJAX subscription form is implemented with fetch API and basic validation. No advanced frameworks or hosting provider information is detected. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimizations noted. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. SEO is minimal with basic meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features are limited. The site would benefit from improved technical SEO, accessibility, and security hardening.
Analyze Another Website