Skip to main content

Is mallardmfg.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Mallard Manufacturing Reviews

mallardmfg.com favicon

Is mallardmfg.com Safe? Security Analysis for Mallard Manufacturing

Check if mallardmfg.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingUnited Statesmedium
WordPressWooCommerceGravity FormsBootstrapGoogle reCAPTCHA+4 more
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 4:23:19 PM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Mallard Manufacturing is a well-established company specializing in gravity flow storage solutions including pallet flow racks, carton flow racks, and gravity conveyor systems. The company targets warehouse managers and logistics professionals seeking to optimize warehouse productivity. Their market position is strong as a leading manufacturer in this niche, supported by a domain age dating back to 2000 and consistent branding across their digital presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Gravity Forms, leveraging modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrating Google reCAPTCHA and Cookiebot for security and privacy compliance. The site demonstrates good SEO and mobile optimization, though accessibility is basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections, but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Privacy compliance is robust with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. However, the absence of a terms of service page and explicit security policy or incident response contacts are notable gaps. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and business credible with moderate technical and security maturity.

Detected Technologies

WordPressWooCommerceGravity FormsBootstrapGoogle reCAPTCHACookiebotjQueryAxiosQS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Mallard Manufacturing operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on industrial storage solutions. Their business model is B2B, serving warehouse and logistics sectors. The company benefits from a long domain history and uses multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools to drive customer engagement and track performance. Partnerships with call tracking and chatbot service providers enhance their customer interaction capabilities. The company does not publicly list certifications or subsidiaries, indicating a focused operational scope. The website content is relevant and professionally presented, supporting their market positioning as a specialized manufacturer. Growth indicators include active marketing and analytics integration, though no direct revenue or financial data is available.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR compliance. Domain status flags clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited enhance domain security. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represent areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and readiness perception. Overall, the security posture is moderate with good foundational controls but room for enhancement in defense-in-depth and policy communication.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Mallard Manufacturing

Description:

Gravity flow storage - leading manufacturers of pallet flow, carton flow & gravity conveyor. Optimize warehouse productivity -Call Mallard.

Key Services:
pallet flow rackscarton flow racksgravity conveyor systems
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressWooCommerceGravity FormsBootstrapGoogle reCAPTCHACookiebotjQueryAxiosQS
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • ClientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsWordPress.com StatsCallRail
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdSenseFacebook AdsMicrosoft Advertising
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelCallRail tracking
Marketing Tools:
CookiebotCallRailLucky OrangeSimpleBotInstall
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website uses modern CMS and plugins with good SEO and accessibility basics

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

88/100
Score

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:70.32.23.65 include:_spf.createsend.com include:spf.supercp.com +a +mx +ip4:173.229.8.194 +ip4:205.237.208.124 +include:spf.protection.outlook.com +include:transmail.net +include:spf.spamhero.com +include:one.zoho.com -all
DNS Lookups:8/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 55 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
25 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(106 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:173.249.144.82
Name Servers:
ns1.uxidns3.com
ns2.uxidns3.com
ns3.uxidns3.com
ns4.uxidns3.com
MX Records:
0: mallardmfg-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:39ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:70.32.23.65 include:_spf.createsend.com include:spf.supercp.com +a +mx +ip4:173.229.8.194 +ip4:205.237.208.124 +include:spf.protection.outlook.com +include:transmail.net +include:spf.spamhero.com +include:one.zoho.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a mature WordPress platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities and Gravity Forms for data collection. It uses Bootstrap for responsive design and integrates multiple third-party scripts for analytics, marketing, and user interaction such as Google Analytics, CallRail, Lucky Orange, and SimpleBotInstall chatbot. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and preloading of fonts. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) describing the business and webpage. Accessibility features are basic but present. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party services which increase complexity and potential privacy concerns. Modernization opportunities include tightening security headers and optimizing third-party script usage for performance and privacy.
Analyze Another Website