Skip to main content

Is mandele.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - mandele.lv Reviews

M

Is mandele.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Security Verification

Check if mandele.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:05:57 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website mandele.lv currently presents only a security verification page employing Google reCAPTCHA v3, indicating the presence of a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or bot protection mechanism. Due to this, the actual website content is inaccessible, preventing extraction of business, contact, or compliance information. The WHOIS query limit was exceeded, resulting in no available domain registration data, which further limits legitimacy assessment. Technically, the site uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 and Google reCAPTCHA but lacks visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement in the provided data. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, and no contact or business details are publicly available. Overall, the site’s security posture is minimal beyond bot protection, and the business credibility cannot be established from the current data.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business information, company name, or sector details are available due to the blocked content and lack of WHOIS data. The site appears to be in a protective mode, possibly to prevent automated access or abuse. No social media or partner domains are linked. Without accessible content or metadata, no insights into market positioning, revenue streams, or customer segments can be derived.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is limited to the use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot mitigation. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers in the provided HTML snippet. The presence of a security verification page suggests an active WAF or similar protection, but no further security policies, incident response contacts, or certifications are visible. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps. Overall, the security maturity is low with room for significant improvement in transparency and technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website content is a security verification page with Google reCAPTCHA invisible challenge, indicating a WAF or bot protection mechanism blocking direct access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3
Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
25/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently inaccessible beyond a security verification page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.stackmail.com a mx -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 43 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.mandele.lv
Issuer:R10
Valid Until:9/12/2025 (43 days)
SANs:*.mandele.lv, mandele.lv

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:185.151.30.178
AAAA Records:2a07:7800::178
Name Servers:
ns1.zehost.netDNS only
ns2.zehost.netDNS only
ns3.zehost.netDNS only
ns4.zehost.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.stackmail.com
SOA:Serial: 1693573751, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:231ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.stackmail.com a mx -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 for styling and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. The site is currently inaccessible beyond the security verification page, limiting performance and SEO analysis. The technical implementation is minimal and focused on security verification rather than content delivery. There is an opportunity to modernize the site with improved security headers, HTTPS enforcement, and enhanced user experience once access restrictions are lifted.
Analyze Another Website