Skip to main content

Is mane.com a Scam? Security Check Results - MANE Group Reviews

mane.com favicon

Is mane.com Safe? Security Analysis for MANE Group

Check if mane.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingFrancelarge
JavaScriptjQueryBootstrapSwiperGoogle Analytics+3 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:44:19 AM
71
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

MANE Group is a leading French manufacturer specializing in fragrances and flavours, with a heritage dating back to 1871. The company operates globally, serving B2B customers in various industries requiring high-quality flavour and fragrance ingredients. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content about their products, innovation, sustainability, and corporate social responsibility. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Analytics, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, providing a good user experience. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms but lacks published security policies and incident response information, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, though the overall business credibility is supported by consistent branding and social media presence.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptjQueryBootstrapSwiperGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebotMapbox GL JS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

MANE Group holds a strong market position as a top French and global player in the fragrance and flavour manufacturing sector. Their business model focuses on innovation, sustainability, and quality, targeting industrial clients in food, beverage, cosmetics, and consumer goods. The company leverages its 150-year history as a competitive advantage. Their digital ecosystem includes multiple language sites and active social media channels, indicating a global outreach strategy. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the website suggests a preference for controlled communication via contact forms. The company publishes CSR reports and engages in sustainability initiatives, enhancing its brand reputation and compliance with modern corporate standards.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

M*****@mane.juicer

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent compliance, indicating awareness of privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, the absence of security headers, published security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for maturity improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a negative factor for trust but may be due to privacy protection services. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting best practices in security governance and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

MANE Group

Description:

MANE is the first French group and one of the worldwide leaders of the Fragrance and Flavour industry. The headquarters are based in Le Bar-sur-Loup, in Southern France, near Grasse.

Key Services:
FlavoursFragrancesIngredients
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptjQueryBootstrapSwiperGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebotMapbox GL JS
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Cookiebot
Marketing Tools:
Cookiebot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

85/100
Score

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a ip4:95.179.210.164 ip4:188.165.33.87 ip4:90.85.128.171 ip4:216.68.128.162 ip4:4.59.22.9 ip4:119.252.168.43 ip4:203.130.233.139 ip4:58.137.122.104 ip4:200.76.53.6 ip4:83.118.78.133 ip4:182.72.93.38 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_reports@mane.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
27 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(3612 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:95.179.210.164
Name Servers:
nsa.perf1.fr
nsb.perf1.com
nsc.perf1.com
MX Records:
10: mane-com.mail.protection.outlook.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Craft CMS with a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and Swiper for interactive sliders. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, alongside Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site loads multimedia content such as videos and audio, indicating moderate performance demands. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility features appear basic. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security header configurations.
Analyze Another Website