Skip to main content

Is manor.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Manor & Co Reviews

manor.lv favicon

Is manor.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Manor & Co

Check if manor.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
jQuery 1.10.2Facebook PixelTilda CMS scriptsGoogle Fonts
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 1:00:39 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Manor & Co is a small real estate consultancy based in Latvia, specializing in helping property owners sell their real estate at maximum value within a 60-day timeframe. The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform and leverages Tilda's CDN and Facebook Pixel for marketing and tracking purposes. The site presents a professional design with clear navigation and mobile optimization, targeting property owners seeking expert consultation and valuation services. However, the absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers and lack of privacy and cookie policies limit its transparency and compliance posture. Security headers and WHOIS data are not available, which impacts the overall security assessment. The website is accessible without WAF or security challenges, indicating no blocking mechanisms in place.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.10.2Facebook PixelTilda CMS scriptsGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the real estate sector, focusing on sales consulting and valuation services. Its business model revolves around providing expert advice and facilitating property sales efficiently. The target audience is property owners in Latvia looking for professional assistance to maximize their property's sale value. The use of Facebook Pixel suggests active marketing efforts to reach potential clients. The company appears to be a small entity with no visible parent or subsidiary relationships. The website content is consistent and professionally presented, though it lacks comprehensive trust indicators such as certifications or client testimonials.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (5)

i*****@manor.lv
d*****@manor.lv
a*****@manor.lv
i*****@manor.lvCall
i*****@gmail.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and includes Facebook Pixel scripts but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No direct contact emails or incident response information are provided, and there is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security policies. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, preventing verification of domain legitimacy and registrant details. Overall, the security posture is basic with room for significant improvement in transparency, compliance, and technical security measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Manor & Co

Description:

Real estate service focused on selling properties at maximum value within 60 days.

Key Services:
Real estate valuationConsultationProperty sales optimization
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.10.2Facebook PixelTilda CMS scriptsGoogle Fonts
Frameworks:
Tilda
Platforms:
Tilda
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Facebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website uses Tilda CMS and CDN services

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:webmail.garmtech.net a:web16.garmtech.net a:ns2.garmtech.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 56 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:52.211.245.146
Name Servers:
ns1.garmtech.comDNS only
ns2.garmtech.comDNS only
ns3.garmtech.comDNS only
MX Records:
20: mx2.garmtech.com
10: mail.manor.lv
SOA:Serial: 2023031795, TTL: 10800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:395ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:webmail.garmtech.net a:web16.garmtech.net a:ns2.garmtech.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using the Tilda CMS platform, utilizing its CDN for hosting static assets and JavaScript libraries. It employs jQuery 1.10.2 and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate, with no explicit performance optimization indicators found. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal with canonical and Open Graph meta tags present but no structured data (JSON-LD) detected. The lack of security headers and absence of direct contact information are notable technical gaps. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security practices.
Analyze Another Website