Skip to main content

Is manta.network a Scam? Security Check Results - Manta Network Reviews

manta.network favicon

Is manta.network Safe? Security Analysis for Manta Network

Check if manta.network is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQuerySwiper.js+5 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 4:18:25 AM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Manta Network is a blockchain technology company specializing in modular Layer 2 solutions that leverage zero-knowledge proofs and advanced cryptographic techniques to provide scalable, low-cost, and privacy-preserving infrastructure for decentralized applications. Positioned as the largest modular L2, it is backed by prominent investors such as Binance Labs and Polychain, indicating strong market credibility and growth potential. The company targets developers and blockchain users seeking high throughput and low fees, offering services including developer documentation, cross-chain bridges, staking, governance, and ecosystem grants. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, comprehensive content, and active community engagement across multiple social platforms. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks, analytics tools, and responsive design, ensuring fast performance and good accessibility. The infrastructure integrates with Ethereum-compatible platforms and leverages Celestia data availability and OP Stack, showcasing advanced blockchain interoperability. However, the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies and lack of visible security headers indicate areas for compliance and security enhancement. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, but could improve by implementing standard security headers and publishing vulnerability disclosure information. The WHOIS data is limited due to privacy protection, which is common and justified in this sector. Overall, the site demonstrates a strong security posture with minor gaps in transparency and compliance. The overall risk assessment is low, with recommendations focusing on enhancing privacy compliance, security header implementation, and providing clear contact channels for incident response. These improvements would further solidify trust and regulatory adherence, supporting Manta Network's position as a leading modular blockchain provider.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQuerySwiper.jsBigNumber.jsGSAPGoogle Tag ManagerFathom AnalyticsCookbookdev Docsbot

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Manta Network operates in the competitive blockchain infrastructure market, focusing on modular Layer 2 scalability and privacy solutions. Its competitive advantages include early adoption of Celestia data availability, integration with Ethereum-compatible environments, and strong backing from top-tier investors. The business model revolves around providing scalable blockchain infrastructure, developer tools, and ecosystem incentives to attract decentralized application builders. Revenue streams likely include token economics, staking rewards, and partnerships. The target customer segments are blockchain developers, DeFi projects, and privacy-conscious users. Growth indicators include over 200 ecosystem projects, active campaigns, and a vibrant community. The partnership ecosystem includes Binance Labs, Polychain, and Alliance, enhancing credibility and resource access. Strategic observations highlight a focus on modularity, developer experience, and cross-chain interoperability as key differentiators.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Manta Network exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of deferred and asynchronous script loading reduces attack surface. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a compliance gap that could expose the site to clickjacking or content injection risks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency. GDPR compliance indicators are minimal due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The site does not expose contact information for security incidents, which is a best practice for blockchain projects. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by adopting standard headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Manta Network

Description:

Manta Network is the largest modular L2, bringing the highest throughput and lowest fees to enable scalable adoption for over 200 decentralized applications. Secured by Celestia and OP Stack.

Key Services:
Modular Layer 2 blockchainDeveloper tools and documentationCross-chain bridges (Atlantic and Pacific Bridges)Staking and governanceEcosystem grants and developer support
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQuerySwiper.jsBigNumber.jsGSAPGoogle Tag ManagerFathom AnalyticsCookbookdev Docsbot
Platforms:
Ethereum (EVM compatible)Celestia DAPolygon zkEVMOP Stack
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of deferred and async script loading
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Fathom AnalyticsGoogle Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Fathom Analytics
Marketing Tools:
Fathom Analytics
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, YouTube, Cloudflare

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.mlsend.com include:amazonses.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1096-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:rua@dmarc.brevo.com, report@manta.network

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 74 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-a1.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-a2.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-a3.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-a4.googledomains.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 257, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:108ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.mlsend.com include:amazonses.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and popular libraries such as jQuery, Swiper.js, GSAP, and BigNumber.js. It integrates analytics tools like Fathom and Google Tag Manager for user tracking and marketing insights. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is fast with efficient script loading and minimal blocking resources. The platform leverages Ethereum-compatible blockchain technologies and modular Layer 2 solutions secured by Celestia and OP Stack. No CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly detected. Technical risks are low, but the lack of security headers and privacy compliance pages represent areas for modernization and risk mitigation.
Analyze Another Website