Skip to main content

Is maple.finance a Scam? Security Check Results - Maple Finance Reviews

maple.finance favicon

Is maple.finance Safe? Security Analysis for Maple Finance

Check if maple.finance is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/amedium
AstroJavaScriptGoogle FontsGoogle Tag ManagerIntercom
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:09:30 PM
70
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Maple Finance is a professional onchain asset management platform combining traditional finance expertise with decentralized finance innovation. It offers digital asset lending and yield products targeting both individual and institutional investors. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates modern technologies such as the Astro framework, Google Analytics, Segment, and Intercom for analytics and customer support. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, but lacks explicit security headers and published privacy or cookie policies. No contact emails or phone numbers are visible, which slightly reduces transparency. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, with a moderate to high AI score reflecting good content quality and business credibility but room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

AstroJavaScriptGoogle FontsGoogle Tag ManagerIntercom

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Maple Finance positions itself as a leading DeFi asset manager with a focus on institutional quality yield products and overcollateralized loans. The business model centers on onchain asset management and lending, leveraging blockchain technology to provide secure and liquid financial products. The website showcases trusted partners and emphasizes expertise, targeting a global audience excluding US residents for certain products. The company appears medium-sized with a strong brand presence and consistent messaging. The lack of detailed WHOIS data is mitigated by professional site content and integration of reputable analytics and support tools. Growth potential is supported by the combination of traditional finance and DeFi innovation.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

c*****@maple.finance

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern frameworks, but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others that enhance protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is published, and no incident response contacts are provided. The absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies indicates partial compliance with privacy regulations like GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, publish privacy and cookie policies, and provide incident response information to improve trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Maple Finance

Description:

Maple is an onchain Asset Manager with decades of traditional finance and crypto experience. Maple combines deep capital markets expertise with DeFi innovation to offer digital asset lending and yield products.

Key Services:
Digital asset lendingYield productsOnchain asset management
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
AstroJavaScriptGoogle FontsGoogle Tag ManagerIntercom
Frameworks:
Astro
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsSegment
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
SegmentIntercom
Marketing Tools:
IntercomSegment
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

75/100
Score

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "1"

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:25712430.spf05.hubspotemail.net include:spf.mtasv.net include:smtp.mail.ethermail.io ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@maple.finance

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:marketing.eth.maple.finance
Issuer:Amazon RSA 2048 M03
Valid Until:6/5/2026 (272 days)
SANs:marketing.eth.maple.finance, maple.finance

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:3.164.206.76, 3.164.206.83, 3.164.206.84, 3.164.206.113
AAAA Records:2600:9000:278f:e00:11:e51f:680:93a1, 2600:9000:278f:2000:11:e51f:680:93a1, 2600:9000:278f:2800:11:e51f:680:93a1, 2600:9000:278f:5400:11:e51f:680:93a1, 2600:9000:278f:c600:11:e51f:680:93a1, 2600:9000:278f:e800:11:e51f:680:93a1, 2600:9000:278f:ec00:11:e51f:680:93a1, 2600:9000:278f:f200:11:e51f:680:93a1
Name Servers:
dana.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
lex.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2381786934, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:108ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:25712430.spf05.hubspotemail.net include:spf.mtasv.net include:smtp.mail.ethermail.io ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses the Astro framework, a modern static site generator, combined with JavaScript for dynamic components. It loads fonts from Google Fonts and integrates third-party services such as Google Analytics, Segment, and Intercom for analytics and customer engagement. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter Card tags. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. No CMS or hosting provider details were identified from the HTML. The site lacks some advanced accessibility features and security headers, which are areas for technical improvement.
Analyze Another Website