Skip to main content

Is mappingthegayguides.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Privacy Protect, LLC Reviews

P

Is mappingthegayguides.org Safe? Security Analysis for Privacy Protect, LLC

Check if mappingthegayguides.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statessmall
JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHABitNinja security service
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 5:54:19 AM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website mappingthegayguides.org currently serves as a security validation gateway powered by BitNinja, requiring visitors to complete a CAPTCHA to proceed. It primarily functions as an anti-bot and IP greylist management page rather than a business or content site. The domain is privacy protected and hosted by Reclaim Hosting, with legacy CMS meta tags suggesting Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, though these are likely remnants rather than active platforms. The site uses Google Analytics and Google reCAPTCHA for tracking and bot mitigation. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. No privacy, cookie, or terms policies are present, and no contact or business information is provided on the site.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHABitNinja security service

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The domain is registered to Privacy Protect, LLC, a privacy protection service, which is consistent with the site's security-focused role. The business model centers on security filtering and bot prevention, targeting general internet users who may be blocked due to suspicious activity. There is no direct business content, marketing, or service offering visible. The site acts as a security checkpoint rather than a commercial or informational platform. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site enforces HTTPS and uses CAPTCHA to prevent automated malicious access, which are positive security measures. However, it lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and shows meta tags of outdated CMS versions, which could pose risks if those platforms were active. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps. The site is a WAF/security challenge page, limiting content access until CAPTCHA completion. Incident response and security policy information are absent. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with modern best practices and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

The website content is a security CAPTCHA challenge page by BitNinja, blocking access until CAPTCHA is solved.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Company:

Privacy Protect, LLC

Description:

This website is a security validation page that requires visitors to complete a CAPTCHA to continue browsing. It is designed to block IP addresses suspected of violating server security rules and to prevent automated malicious visits.

Key Services:
IP blockingCAPTCHA validationGreylist management by BitNinja
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHABitNinja security service
Frameworks:
Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CAPTCHA to prevent automated access
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a CAPTCHA security challenge page by BitNinja

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:147.135.81.24 +a +mx +ip4:159.65.185.82 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 52 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(313 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:147.135.81.24
Name Servers:
ns1.reclaimhosting.com
ns2.reclaimhosting.com
MX Records:
0: mappingthegayguides.org
SOA:Serial: 2025073101, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:408ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:147.135.81.24 +a +mx +ip4:159.65.185.82 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a minimalistic design focused on CAPTCHA validation, leveraging Google reCAPTCHA and Google Analytics scripts. Hosting is provided by Reclaim Hosting, and the domain is registered via PublicDomainRegistry.com with privacy protection. The presence of Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5 meta tags suggests legacy CMS usage or remnants, which should be addressed. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO is poor due to minimal content and lack of meta descriptions beyond generic tags. The site is functional for its security purpose but lacks modern web development practices and comprehensive content.
Analyze Another Website