Is marginal.network Safe? Security Analysis for Marginal - Trade anything with leverage, fully onchain
Check if marginal.network is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Marginal.network is a decentralized finance (DeFi) platform offering permissionless leveraged trading fully onchain. The website presents a modern, clean design built with Framer, targeting cryptocurrency traders and blockchain enthusiasts interested in advanced trading capabilities. The platform emphasizes decentralization and onchain operations, positioning itself within the growing DeFi ecosystem. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies and fonts but lacks advanced SEO optimization and security headers. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact information, limits its compliance posture and business credibility. Security posture is moderate with no visible vulnerabilities but missing best practices such as security headers and incident response details. Overall, the site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, but WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common in this sector but reduces transparency. Strategic improvements in compliance, security, and business transparency are recommended.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Marginal.network operates in the technology sector focused on decentralized finance. Its business model revolves around providing a permissionless hyperstructure for leveraged trading on blockchain networks. The target audience includes DeFi users and crypto traders seeking advanced trading tools. The platform likely generates revenue through trading fees or protocol incentives. The website lacks detailed business information, certifications, or partnerships, which limits insight into its market position and growth indicators. The use of privacy-protected WHOIS data aligns with common practices in blockchain projects to protect identity. The absence of contact and compliance information suggests an early-stage or privacy-conscious operation. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The security maturity of marginal.network is moderate. The site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. No incident response or security policy information is provided, which is a gap for trust and compliance. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for DeFi projects but reduces transparency. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal user tracking and lower privacy risk. Overall, the site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities but would benefit from implementing security best practices and transparency measures.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
A permissionless defi hyperstructure.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
poor
Security Assessment
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a decentralized finance platform focused on leveraged trading fully onchain.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Twitter
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 33 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings