Skip to main content

Is marsand.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Marsand Reviews

marsand.lv favicon

Is marsand.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Marsand

Check if marsand.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
WordPressPHPjQueryFont AwesomeEssential Real Estate plugin+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:20:54 PM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Marsand.lv is a Latvian real estate agency website offering property sales and rental services. The site targets individuals and businesses interested in real estate within Latvia. The website is built on WordPress using popular plugins such as Essential Real Estate and Elementor, indicating a modern and maintainable technical infrastructure. The site employs HTTPS and security headers, reflecting a good security posture. However, the absence of a visible privacy policy and terms of service pages, as well as lack of explicit contact information, limits full compliance and trust. No WHOIS data was retrievable due to query limits, which restricts domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is professional and safe but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPjQueryFont AwesomeEssential Real Estate pluginElementorWP Rocket

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Marsand operates as a small local real estate agency in Latvia, focusing on property brokerage and rentals. The business model revolves around connecting buyers and sellers or renters and landlords. The website content and structure suggest a focus on local market clients. The use of SEO tools like Rank Math indicates an effort to improve online visibility. The lack of detailed company registration or VAT information on the site limits deeper business intelligence. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data provided.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present. The use of a content security policy and cookie consent banner are positive indicators. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms such as security.txt reduces the overall security maturity. The site would benefit from adding these elements to improve incident handling and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Marsand

Description:

Marsand is a real estate agency based in Latvia, offering services related to property sales and rentals.

Key Services:
Real estate salesProperty rentalsBrokerage services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPjQueryFont AwesomeEssential Real Estate pluginElementorWP Rocket
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy present
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Rank Math SEO
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based real estate agency site in Latvia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

25/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.224 +ip4:85.31.97.28 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 41 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.224
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: marsand.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025061300, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:232ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.224 +ip4:85.31.97.28 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with Elementor and Essential Real Estate plugins, leveraging modern web fonts and lazy loading scripts for performance. The presence of WP Rocket indicates caching and optimization efforts. The site loads multiple font resources and uses jQuery and Font Awesome libraries. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO is supported by Rank Math plugin. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No hosting provider details were found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance tuning.
Analyze Another Website