Skip to main content

Is maryland.gov a Scam? Security Check Results - State of Maryland Reviews

maryland.gov favicon

Is maryland.gov Safe? Security Analysis for State of Maryland

Check if maryland.gov is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentUnited Statesenterprise
jQuery 3.6.0BootstrapGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsMicrosoft ScriptResource.axd+4 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 12:53:05 AM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Maryland.gov is the official website of the State of Maryland, serving as a comprehensive portal for residents, businesses, government employees, and visitors. It provides access to a wide range of state services including online applications, job listings, business resources, and government information. The site is well-positioned as a trusted government resource with a strong focus on accessibility, user experience, and service delivery. Technically, the website leverages a mature technology stack including Microsoft SharePoint as the CMS platform, jQuery, Bootstrap, and integrates analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility compliance, and modern web practices, although performance is moderate likely due to the complexity and volume of content. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses secure form tokens, and includes standard security headers, though explicit Content-Security-Policy headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, but cookie consent mechanisms could be enhanced. The WHOIS data is privacy protected or unavailable, which is typical for government domains, and does not raise legitimacy concerns. Overall, Maryland.gov presents a secure, professional, and user-friendly government portal with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic improvements could focus on enhancing security headers, publishing vulnerability disclosure information, and implementing cookie consent to further strengthen privacy compliance and user trust.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.6.0BootstrapGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsMicrosoft ScriptResource.axdClarity (Microsoft Clarity analytics)Google Custom Search EngineMonsido (accessibility and compliance monitoring)Zaraz (Cloudflare analytics/marketing tool)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Maryland.gov operates as an essential government entity website providing critical services and information to a broad audience including residents, businesses, and government employees. Its market position as the official state portal ensures high trust and authority. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on digital delivery of government functions and resources. The site integrates with multiple state agencies and partner domains, reflecting a robust partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include continuous updates, integration of new services like MarylandBenefits.gov, and awards recognizing digital government excellence. The site’s operations emphasize accessibility, transparency, and constituent engagement.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

187*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, secure form handling, and use of security headers. However, the absence of explicit Content-Security-Policy headers and lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure information represent areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, supporting data protection efforts. The site lacks a cookie consent mechanism, which is a minor compliance gap. Overall, the security maturity is strong for a government portal but could benefit from enhanced transparency and additional security controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting and related attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

State of Maryland

Description:

Official government portal providing access to state services, information, and resources for residents, businesses, visitors, and government employees.

Key Services:
Online ServicesState Employee ResourcesJob ListingsBusiness ResourcesGovernment InformationResident ServicesEducationVisitor Information
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.6.0BootstrapGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsMicrosoft ScriptResource.axdClarity (Microsoft Clarity analytics)Google Custom Search EngineMonsido (accessibility and compliance monitoring)Zaraz (Cloudflare analytics/marketing tool)
Frameworks:
SharePoint Framework
Platforms:
Microsoft SharePoint
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

excellent

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure forms with anti-forgery tokens (__REQUESTDIGEST)
  • Accessibility and privacy notices

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft Clarity
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Adsense
Tracking Pixels:
Microsoft ClarityZaraz
Marketing Tools:
Zaraz
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Official state government website with comprehensive services and resources.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15552000; includeSubDomains; preload"

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ip4:74.209.171.228 ip4:167.102.227.55 ip4:167.102.240.2 ip4:167.102.241.229 ip4:167.102.241.230 ip4:167.102.240.3 ip4:167.102.25.133 ip4:66.77.73.0/24 ip4:66.77.69.0/24 ip4:184.80.199.48 ip4:23.227.164.145 ip4:136.179.3.130 ip4:107.20.210.250 ip4:52.1.14.157 ip4:142.0.180.170 ip4:142.0.186.121 ip4:149.72.151.35 ip4:149.72.183.8 ip4:149.72.201.153 ip4:149.72.231.47 ip4:149.72.22.42 ip4:149.72.61.106 ip4:159.183.141.212 ip4:159.183.141.213 ip4:159.183.141.214 ip4:149.72.231.47 ip4:149.72.196.66 include:_spf.psm.knowbe4.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:spf.blackboardconnect.com ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:dkim(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc.doit@maryland.gov
Forensic Reports:dmarc.doit@maryland.gov

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

65/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 56 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

12 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:maryland.gov
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/1/2025 (56 days)
SANs:maryland.gov, *.maryland.gov

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
25 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(346 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:104.18.17.121, 104.18.16.121
AAAA Records:2606:4700::6812:1079, 2606:4700::6812:1179
Name Servers:
blue.foundationdns.com
blue.foundationdns.net
blue.foundationdns.org
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382567811, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:79ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ip4:74.209.171.228 ip4:167.102.227.55 ip4:167.102.240.2 ip4:167.102.241.229 ip4:167.102.241.230 ip4:167.102.240.3 ip4:167.102.25.133 ip4:66.77.73.0/24 ip4:66.77.69.0/24 ip4:184.80.199.48 ip4:23.227.164.145 ip4:136.179.3.130 ip4:107.20.210.250 ip4:52.1.14.157 ip4:142.0.180.170 ip4:142.0.186.121 ip4:149.72.151.35 ip4:149.72.183.8 ip4:149.72.201.153 ip4:149.72.231.47 ip4:149.72.22.42 ip4:149.72.61.106 ip4:159.183.141.212 ip4:159.183.141.213 ip4:159.183.141.214 ip4:149.72.231.47 ip4:149.72.196.66 include:_spf.psm.knowbe4.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:spf.blackboardconnect.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Microsoft SharePoint, leveraging its robust CMS capabilities and integration with Microsoft technologies. It uses modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Bootstrap for UI responsiveness and interactivity. Analytics and tracking are implemented via Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Google Tag Manager, providing comprehensive user behavior insights. The site demonstrates good accessibility features and mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, likely due to the volume of content and third-party integrations. Opportunities exist to optimize loading times and streamline scripts. The technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and privacy controls.
Analyze Another Website