Skip to main content

Is masterpublitalia.it a Scam? Security Check Results - masterpublitalia.it Reviews

M

Is masterpublitalia.it Safe? Security Analysis for Waiting for the redirectiron...

Check if masterpublitalia.it is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 4:41:32 PM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website masterpublitalia.it currently presents a security challenge page that blocks direct access to its content, indicating the presence of a Web Application Firewall or similar security mechanism. The domain is well-established, created in 2001, and DNSSEC is enabled, suggesting good domain registration hygiene. However, the visible content is minimal and outdated, referencing Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5 CMS versions, which are known to have multiple security vulnerabilities. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact information or business details are visible, limiting trust and transparency. The site uses BitNinja for security checks, indicating an active defense posture but also limiting content accessibility for analysis.

Detected Technologies

Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the content being blocked by a security challenge, there is insufficient information to determine the company's market positioning, business model, or key services. The domain age suggests a long-standing presence, but the lack of visible business information and outdated CMS usage imply potential neglect or low digital maturity. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The absence of contact details and policies further reduces business credibility and customer trust.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture shows mixed signals: DNSSEC and HTTPS are enabled, and BitNinja security checks are active, which are positive indicators. However, the use of outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) exposes the site to known vulnerabilities. No security headers are detected, and no privacy or cookie policies are implemented. The security challenge page blocks content, which protects the site but also hinders transparency. Overall, the site requires urgent updates and improved security practices to reduce risk.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade all CMS platforms to their latest supported versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website displays a security challenge page with automatic redirect and browser integrity check, indicating presence of a WAF or security protection mechanism.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

Joomla!

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5
Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked by a security challenge page, limiting content visibility.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 34 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
24 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(282 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC ON
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:86.107.32.24
Name Servers:
ns1.f5clouddns.comDNS only
ns2.f5clouddns.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2023051008, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:106ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses very outdated CMS technologies (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5), which are no longer supported and pose significant security risks. The site is protected by a security challenge mechanism powered by BitNinja, which blocks direct content access and performs browser integrity checks. No modern analytics, advertising, or tracking technologies are detected. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features, and SEO is minimal due to the lack of content and meta tags beyond basic keywords. The domain is secured with DNSSEC and HTTPS, but the absence of security headers and outdated software indicates technical debt and modernization needs.
Analyze Another Website