Skip to main content

Is matrix.to a Scam? Security Check Results - Matrix.org Reviews

M

Is matrix.to Safe? Security Analysis for Matrix.org

Check if matrix.to is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
JavaScriptRegeneratorRuntimeCSS
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 9:21:06 AM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Matrix.to is a specialized web service that facilitates the creation of shareable links to Matrix network rooms, users, and messages. It operates as part of the Matrix.org ecosystem, which is focused on decentralized and secure communication. The website serves a niche audience of Matrix users and communities seeking easy access and sharing capabilities without being tied to specific client applications. The business model appears to be community and open source driven, with no direct monetization evident on the site. Technically, the website uses JavaScript and CSS with client-side processing to preserve user privacy. The site is functional and moderately optimized for performance and mobile use, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks. The site links to GitHub repositories, indicating open source transparency. From a security perspective, the site lacks explicit security headers and documented security policies. HTTPS usage is assumed but not confirmed from the data. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which limits compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The absence of contact information and incident response details reduces transparency. However, the association with Matrix.org and open source nature provide some trust signals. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy for its intended purpose but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security policies, and contact transparency to improve user trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptRegeneratorRuntimeCSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Matrix.to operates within the decentralized communication sector, leveraging the Matrix.org Foundation's ecosystem. Its competitive advantage lies in providing a simple, app-agnostic link creation tool that supports Matrix's open network philosophy. The business model is likely non-commercial or community-supported, focusing on user adoption and ecosystem growth rather than direct revenue. The target customers are Matrix users, developers, and communities. The presence of GitHub links suggests active community involvement and potential for collaborative development. The site does not display commercial partnerships or payment processing, indicating a focus on open source and community trust rather than monetization. Growth indicators include integration with multiple Matrix clients and ongoing open source development.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of matrix.to is moderate. The site uses client-side processing to enhance privacy, which is a positive practice. However, the lack of visible security headers and absence of documented security policies or incident response contacts are weaknesses. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site does not implement privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance gap. The absence of HTTPS confirmation is a concern but likely present given the Matrix.org ecosystem standards. Overall, the site demonstrates basic security hygiene but should improve transparency and compliance to strengthen its security posture.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publicly display a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Matrix.org

Description:

Matrix.to is a service that creates shareable links to Matrix rooms, users, or messages without being tied to any app. It facilitates decentralized and secure communication on the Matrix network.

Key Services:
Creating shareable links to Matrix roomsCreating shareable links to Matrix usersCreating shareable links to Matrix messages
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptRegeneratorRuntimeCSS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • Client-side processing to preserve privacy

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a functional tool for creating Matrix communication links.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine0
Aggregate Reports:element-d@dmarc.report-uri.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 77 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:matrix.to
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/23/2025 (77 days)
SANs:matrix.to

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain:

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.129.62, 104.21.2.132
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3035::6815:284, 2606:4700:3034::ac43:813e
Name Servers:
derek.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
laura.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
0:
SOA:Serial: 2381404296, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:100ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using standard web technologies including JavaScript and CSS, with client-side rendering indicated by the use of regeneratorRuntime and bundled JS/CSS files. There is no evidence of a CMS or server-side frameworks. The site loads a CSS bundle and a JavaScript bundle, suggesting a modern modular build process. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. SEO is basic with meta tags for description and Twitter cards but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility features are minimal, with a noscript fallback message. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not provided, limiting deeper technical assessment. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Analyze Another Website