Skip to main content

Is max.ooo a Scam? Security Check Results - Shandong Normal University Reviews

S

Is max.ooo Safe? Security Analysis for Shandong Normal University

Check if max.ooo is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyChinasmall
WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1PHP (implied by WordPress)Google Domains DNSFontAwesome+2 more
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 7:29:23 PM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

MAX . ooO is a Chinese-language website dedicated to sharing and exchanging original AI models, plugins, tools, and creative works. The platform targets AI enthusiasts and developers interested in AI-generated content and resources, operating as a community-driven content sharing site. The domain is registered to Shandong Normal University, lending academic credibility and a degree of trustworthiness. The website uses WordPress CMS with a modern theme and plugins, hosted with DNS services from Google Domains and registered via Squarespace Domains II LLC. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO, with a good user experience and clear navigation.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1PHP (implied by WordPress)Google Domains DNSFontAwesomeContact Form 7 pluginAdore Themes - Cheerful Blog theme

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website occupies a niche market focused on AI model sharing and collaboration, primarily serving a Chinese-speaking audience. It leverages community contributions and provides a platform for non-commercial sharing of AI models. The business model centers on content sharing and community engagement rather than direct monetization. The lack of explicit business contact details and policies suggests a small-scale operation, likely academic or hobbyist in nature. The presence of social media links is generic and not tied to verified company accounts, indicating limited marketing or partnership activities.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are important for enhanced security posture. No privacy, cookie, or incident response policies are published, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. The absence of contact emails for security or abuse reporting reduces incident response readiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing DNSSEC, security headers, and publishing relevant policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Shandong Normal University

Description:

A website dedicated to sharing and exchanging original AI models, plugins, tools, and works, primarily focused on AI-generated content and resources for non-commercial use.

Key Services:
Sharing AI modelsProviding plugins and toolsUser submissions and contributions
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1PHP (implied by WordPress)Google Domains DNSFontAwesomeContact Form 7 pluginAdore Themes - Cheerful Blog theme
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientTransferProhibited and clientDeleteProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based blog focused on AI model sharing and community contributions.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:mailgun.org ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 89 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
9 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(549 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:148.135.67.45
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-b1.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b2.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b3.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b4.googledomains.com
MX Records:
10: mxa.mailgun.org
10: mxb.mailgun.org
SOA:Serial: 9, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:111ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:mailgun.org ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with jQuery and uses the Cheerful Blog theme by Adore Themes. It employs common plugins such as Contact Form 7 for user interaction. The hosting and DNS setup involve Google Domains and Squarespace Domains II LLC as registrar. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility are basic but functional. There is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking tools, indicating a privacy-conscious or minimalistic approach. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could expose the site to certain attacks.
Analyze Another Website