Skip to main content

Is maxiline.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - MAXILINE Reviews

maxiline.lv favicon

Is maxiline.lv Safe? Security Analysis for MAXILINE

Check if maxiline.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
WordPressBootstrapjQueryMasterSliderOwl Carousel+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 12:59:07 AM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

MAXILINE is a Latvian logistics and freight forwarding company with over 20 years of experience, offering comprehensive transportation services including land, sea, and air freight, cargo insurance, warehouse services, and brokerage for export/import documentation. The company targets businesses requiring reliable and timely cargo delivery and logistics support. The website is built on WordPress with modern frontend technologies, providing a professional and navigable user experience. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and lack of visible security headers indicate room for improvement in compliance and security posture. The site uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks advanced security headers and incident response information. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust assessment. Overall, the website presents a credible business front with moderate technical maturity and security readiness.

Detected Technologies

WordPressBootstrapjQueryMasterSliderOwl CarouselFont AwesomeReact (vendor scripts)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

MAXILINE operates in the transportation sector, focusing on freight and logistics services in Latvia. The company leverages its 20+ years of experience as a competitive advantage. Its business model centers on service provision to commercial clients needing cargo transport and related services. The website shows membership in local business organizations, indicating community integration and trust. The lack of detailed corporate data such as founding year or registration numbers limits deeper business intelligence. No analytics or marketing tools are evident, suggesting a focus on direct client engagement rather than broad digital marketing. The company maintains a clear service portfolio and contact channels, supporting business credibility.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@maxiline.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712982****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No forms on the homepage reduce risk of data leakage or injection vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency in case of security events. No known vulnerabilities or suspicious scripts were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard security best practices and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

MAXILINE

Description:

MAXILINE is a logistics and freight transportation company offering land full or partial cargo, sea and air freight services, cargo insurance and escort, warehouse services including storage, loading, unloading and transshipment, and brokerage services for export/import/transit documentation.

Key Services:
Freight transportationCargo insurance and escortWarehouse servicesBrokerage services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressBootstrapjQueryMasterSliderOwl CarouselFont AwesomeReact (vendor scripts)
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No forms detected collecting sensitive info on homepage

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

šŸ›”ļøSecurity Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

šŸ‘¤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

šŸ›”ļøNIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

šŸ“§Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject

šŸ†SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 65 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

šŸ“ŠDNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:92.240.65.144
Name Servers:
a.sigmanet.lvDNS only
b.sigmanet.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.latnet.lv
20: mx2.latnet.lv
30: mx3.latnet.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025072401, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:237ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all

⚔Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

šŸ”§Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework and common JavaScript libraries like jQuery, MasterSlider, and Owl Carousel for UI components. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses Font Awesome for icons. React vendor scripts are included but not evidently used in visible content. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate with some heavy slider components. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The site uses HTTPS with valid certificates. No hosting provider information was found in the HTML. The technical stack is modern but basic, with opportunities for performance optimization and enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website