Skip to main content

Is mazehq.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Maze Reviews

mazehq.com favicon

Is mazehq.com Safe? Security Analysis for Maze

Check if mazehq.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Google Tag ManagerUnify Intent TagThree.jsSwiper.js
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 5:02:31 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Maze is a technology company specializing in AI-driven vulnerability management focused on cloud environments. Their platform uses agentic AI to investigate, prioritize, and remediate vulnerabilities, aiming to reduce backlog and accelerate response times. The company positions itself as an innovative player in the cybersecurity market with a modern SaaS offering. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as Three.js and Swiper.js, integrates Google Tag Manager and Unify Intent for analytics and tracking, and is well optimized for mobile and accessibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though explicit security headers and policies are not publicly documented. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy present, but lacks detailed GDPR indicators. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well designed, supporting the company's credibility as a security technology provider.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerUnify Intent TagThree.jsSwiper.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Maze targets security teams and enterprises managing cloud infrastructure, offering AI-powered automation to address the growing challenge of vulnerability backlogs and rapid exploit timelines. Their business model is SaaS-based, focusing on reducing false positives and enabling one-click remediation workflows. The company has secured significant funding ($31 million) indicating investor confidence and market potential. Testimonials from CISOs and security leaders reinforce their market positioning. The website links to a careers page hosted externally, suggesting growth and hiring activity. External domains include LinkedIn for social presence and Ashby for recruitment. The company maintains privacy protection on domain registration, typical for startups in this sector.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options which are recommended best practices. No public security policy, incident response, or vulnerability disclosure pages were found, which could improve transparency and trust. The use of modern JS libraries appears safe with no known vulnerabilities detected in the HTML content. Cookie consent is implemented, but GDPR compliance indicators are minimal. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional documentation and headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response page to improve transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Maze

Description:

Maze is a security platform using modern AI to make decisions for vulnerability management, focusing on cloud vulnerabilities.

Key Services:
AI Agents for vulnerability investigationFalse positive identificationOne-click mitigation and remediationIntegration with cloud vulnerability scanners
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerUnify Intent TagThree.jsSwiper.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JS libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via GTM)Unify Intent
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Unify Intent
Marketing Tools:
Google Analytics (via GTM)Unify Intent
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

27/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

100/100
Score
No issues found
SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-reports@mazehq.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc-reports@mazehq.com
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 85 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(777 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:66.33.213.150
Name Servers:
ns-1355.awsdns-41.org
ns-2021.awsdns-60.co.uk
ns-380.awsdns-47.com
ns-839.awsdns-40.net
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:81ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack including Three.js for graphics, Swiper.js for sliders, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Unify Intent for analytics and user tracking. The HTML is valid and well structured with meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and responsive design. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles are present, supporting good usability. Hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. The site is mobile optimized and uses SVG graphics for logos and icons, enhancing scalability and visual quality.
Analyze Another Website