Skip to main content

Is maziezobini.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - A/S SIROWA RĪGA Reviews

A

Is maziezobini.lv Safe? Security Analysis for A/S SIROWA RĪGA

Check if maziezobini.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareLatviasmall
jQuery 1.7.1FancyboxBootstrap CSSModernizr
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:41:47 PM
35
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website maziezobini.lv serves as an informational and promotional platform for Dentinox pediatric dental care products, operated by the Latvian company A/S SIROWA RĪGA. It targets parents of young children, offering product descriptions and educational content to support children's oral hygiene. The site is modest in scale and focuses on a niche healthcare market segment in Latvia. Technically, the site uses older web technologies such as jQuery 1.7.1 and Bootstrap CSS, with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. The design and user experience are basic but functional, with limited mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is weak due to the use of outdated libraries, absence of security headers, and lack of visible HTTPS enforcement. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which impacts compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the site is legitimate but would benefit from modernization and improved security and compliance measures.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.7.1FancyboxBootstrap CSSModernizr

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

maziezobini.lv operates in the healthcare sector, specifically focusing on pediatric dental care products. The business model centers on product promotion and parental education rather than direct e-commerce. The company leverages social media sharing to increase reach but lacks advanced marketing or analytics tools. The presence of a clear company name and contact details supports trustworthiness. The site appears to be a small-scale operation with a localized market focus in Latvia. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. Growth potential may be limited without digital modernization and enhanced online engagement strategies.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

p*****@sirowa.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

670*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a low to moderate security maturity level. The use of an outdated jQuery version introduces known vulnerabilities that could be exploited. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security are detected, and there is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement from the provided data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site does not collect user input via forms, reducing some attack vectors, but overall security hygiene requires significant improvement to protect user data and maintain trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current supported versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

A/S SIROWA RĪGA

Description:

Dentinox product group offering specialized oral care products for children's dental hygiene, including fluoride and non-fluoride toothpastes, silicone brushes, and nail lacquer to prevent thumb sucking and nail biting.

Key Services:
Children's dental hygiene productsEducational content for parentsPromotional information about Dentinox and related products
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.7.1FancyboxBootstrap CSSModernizr
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • No forms detected to analyze for secure input handling

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: health

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 89 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:109.235.64.89
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a simple technology stack including Bootstrap for styling, jQuery 1.7.1 for JavaScript functionality, and Fancybox for image display. Modernizr is used for feature detection. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced backend platform. The site structure is basic with inline styles and static HTML content. Performance is likely moderate but could be improved with updated libraries and optimization. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. SEO is basic with meta description present but no Open Graph or structured data detected. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal user data collection.
Analyze Another Website