Skip to main content

Is mbd.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA MBD Latvia Reviews

mbd.lv favicon

Is mbd.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA MBD Latvia

Check if mbd.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaLatviamedium
WordPressYoast SEO pluginContact Form 7Google Maps APIGoogle reCAPTCHA+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:03:19 PM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

MBD Latvia is a medium-sized digital marketing agency based in Riga, Latvia, positioned as the largest digital media agency in the Baltic states. The company offers a comprehensive suite of digital marketing services including SEO, search ads, social media communication, digital strategy, Facebook advertising, B2B marketing, global market entry, analytics, programmatic RTB, and video production. Their client base and team size reflect a strong market presence and expertise. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrations such as Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, Google Maps API, and Google reCAPTCHA, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and anti-bot measures in place, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a cookie consent mechanism and a privacy policy in place. Overall, the website is professional, well-structured, and trustworthy, supporting the company's business credibility.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO pluginContact Form 7Google Maps APIGoogle reCAPTCHAjQueryAdobe DTM (Dynamic Tag Management)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

MBD Latvia operates in the media sector, focusing on digital marketing services tailored to businesses in Latvia and the Baltic region. Their competitive advantage lies in their size, certified specialists, and official partnerships with major platforms like Facebook, Google, and Adform. The business model is service-oriented, targeting B2B clients requiring digital marketing expertise. Revenue streams likely include consulting, campaign management, and content production. The company demonstrates growth potential through international market entry services and a broad service portfolio. Their partnership ecosystem includes major digital advertising platforms, enhancing their market reach and credibility.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@mbd.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms against automated abuse. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by the presence of a privacy policy and cookie consent banner. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could benefit from additional hardening measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA MBD Latvia

Description:

MBD Latvia ir daļa no lielākās digitālo mediju aģentūras Baltijas valstīs.

Key Services:
SEOSearch AdsSocial Media CommunicationDigital Marketing Strategy and AuditsFacebook AdvertisingB2B MarketingGlobal Market EntryAnalytics and Tag ManagementProgrammatic RTBVideo Production
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO pluginContact Form 7Google Maps APIGoogle reCAPTCHAjQueryAdobe DTM (Dynamic Tag Management)
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with accept/refuse options

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Adobe DTM
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Facebook AdsGoogle AdsAdform
Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHAAdobe DTM
Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEOAdobe Dynamic Tag Management
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a ip4:164.92.244.67/32 ip4:165.227.141.227/32 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 38 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:135.181.100.92
Name Servers:
ns1.digitalocean.comDNS only
ns2.digitalocean.comDNS only
ns3.digitalocean.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1739185433, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:128ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a ip4:164.92.244.67/32 ip4:165.227.141.227/32 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using modern and widely supported plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Contact Form 7 for form handling. Integration with Google Maps API and Google reCAPTCHA indicates a focus on user experience and security. The site loads scripts asynchronously where possible, improving performance. The design is responsive and mobile-optimized, with clear navigation and structured content. However, some accessibility features could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and functional digital presence with moderate performance.
Analyze Another Website