Skip to main content

Is mcp-stack.com a Scam? Security Check Results - mcp-stack.com Reviews

M

Is mcp-stack.com Safe? Security Analysis for Site Not Found | Framer

Check if mcp-stack.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Inter font (hosted by framerusercontent.com)
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 1:16:19 AM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The domain mcp-stack.com currently hosts no active website content and instead displays a default 'Site Not Found' placeholder page served by Framer. The absence of any business-related content, contact information, or policies indicates the site is not operational or configured. The domain registration data is suspicious due to a future creation date, which undermines trust and legitimacy. Technically, the site uses minimal resources, including the Inter font hosted by Framer's CDN, and DNS is managed via Google Cloud DNS with Squarespace Domains LLC as registrar. Security posture is weak with no DNSSEC, no security headers, and no visible SSL configuration details. Overall, the site lacks essential elements for a professional online presence, including privacy compliance and business credibility.

Detected Technologies

Inter font (hosted by framerusercontent.com)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence can be derived from the current website content as it is a placeholder page. The domain registration and DNS setup suggest intent to use Squarespace and Google Cloud infrastructure, but no active business operations or market positioning are evident. There are no indications of target audience, business model, or services. The lack of contact information and policies further limits any business insights.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is minimal and insufficient. The domain lacks DNSSEC, and no security headers are present in the HTML response. The site does not provide any privacy or cookie policies, nor incident response contacts. The suspicious WHOIS data (future creation date) raises concerns about domain legitimacy. No forms or user inputs are present, reducing attack surface but also indicating no active user engagement. Overall, the site is not secure or compliant with standard security and privacy best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Configure and publish a legitimate website with clear business information and contact details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Inter font (hosted by framerusercontent.com)
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is not configured and shows a default 'Site Not Found' page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 74 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:31.43.160.6, 31.43.161.6
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-b1.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-b2.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-b3.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-b4.googledomains.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:45ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is a minimal placeholder page served by Framer with no active content. The tech stack is limited to font hosting via Framer's CDN and DNS hosted on Google Cloud DNS. The registrar is Squarespace Domains LLC. No CMS or additional frameworks are detected. Performance is moderate due to minimal content. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but limited by lack of content. SEO optimization is poor due to absence of meta tags and structured data. The site lacks any analytics or tracking technologies.
Analyze Another Website