Skip to main content

Is medart.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Med Art klīnika Reviews

medart.lv favicon

Is medart.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Med Art klīnika

Check if medart.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareLatviamedium
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle Tag Manager
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:36:32 PM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Med Art klīnika is a well-established healthcare center based in Latvia, specializing primarily in dermatology and related medical services. The clinic offers a broad range of treatments including aesthetic dermatology, laser therapy, surgery, and nutrition therapy, supported by a team of recognized specialists. The website supports online appointment booking and provides patient education resources, reflecting a modern approach to healthcare delivery. The clinic has a strong market position with over 20 years of operation and a significant patient base, enhancing its credibility in the Latvian healthcare sector. Technically, the website is built with standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing purposes. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although accessibility features could be improved. Performance is moderate, with a professional design and clear navigation structure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs secure forms for data collection. However, it lacks explicit security headers and does not publicly disclose incident response or security policies, which are areas for improvement. Privacy and cookie policies are present and indicate compliance with GDPR, supporting user privacy and consent management. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence for Med Art klīnika, with a solid security posture and compliance framework. The absence of WHOIS data limits full domain trust verification, but the content and business information align with a legitimate healthcare provider. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response policies, and improving accessibility to further strengthen the site's security and compliance posture.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Med Art klīnika operates in the healthcare sector with a focus on dermatology and related specialties. The clinic's business model centers on providing specialized medical services with an emphasis on patient convenience through online appointment scheduling and educational content. The clinic targets a broad audience including general patients seeking dermatological care and specialized treatments. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing presence, reputable specialists, and integration of clinical research, which supports innovation and quality care. The partnership ecosystem includes media exposure and clinical research collaborations, enhancing brand visibility and trust. Growth indicators include diversified service offerings and multilingual website support, catering to a wider demographic. Operationally, the clinic maintains a professional online presence with consistent branding and clear communication channels.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@medart.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712869****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and secure data collection forms. The presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms indicates compliance with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options suggests room for enhancement in defense-in-depth strategies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of publicly available incident response or security policy documents limits transparency in security governance. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces a moderate level of user tracking, which is managed with consent. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing incident response procedures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Med Art klīnika

Description:

Veselības centrs Rīgā. Medicīna kā māksla - labākie veselības nozaru speciālisti vienuviet. Veselības centrs ar online vizīšu pierakstu.

Key Services:
Dermatology consultationsRemote dermatology consultationsAesthetic dermatologyLaser therapySurgeryDiagnosticsCoolSculptingMedical foot careCosmetologyNutrition therapy
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle Tag Manager
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with required fields

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a healthcare clinic specializing in dermatology and related medical services.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:46.19.202.86 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 69 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:46.19.202.84
Name Servers:
ns01.hostings.lvDNS only
ns02.hostings.lvDNS only
MX Records:
5: mail.medart.lv
SOA:Serial: 2024052001, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:82ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:46.19.202.86 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is constructed using standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with integration of Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and features a professional design with clear navigation and SEO-friendly meta tags. No CMS or specific frameworks were identified from the provided content. Performance is moderate, with video backgrounds and rich media content that may impact load times. Accessibility is basic, with potential for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. The technical infrastructure appears stable and suitable for the clinic's needs, though modernization opportunities exist in enhancing security headers and accessibility compliance.
Analyze Another Website