Skip to main content

Is medihub.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - MEDIHUB Reviews

medihub.lv favicon

Is medihub.lv Safe? Security Analysis for MEDIHUB

Check if medihub.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareLatviasmall
JavaScriptVue.jsNuxt.jsGoogle Tag Manager
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:26:43 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

MEDIHUB is a Latvian aesthetic clinic specializing in skin care treatments, targeting clients seeking professional aesthetic services. The website presents a professional and modern design built with Vue.js and Nuxt.js frameworks, incorporating Google Tag Manager for analytics. The technical infrastructure is moderately optimized with good mobile responsiveness and basic SEO features. Security posture is moderate; while HTTPS is presumably enabled, no advanced security headers or policies are evident, and privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptVue.jsNuxt.jsGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

MEDIHUB positions itself as a leading aesthetic clinic in Latvia, focusing on skin care services with offerings such as free initial consultations. The business model is service-oriented, targeting individual clients interested in aesthetic treatments. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a small-sized healthcare business. The use of modern web technologies indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of detailed business registration data and privacy policies suggests areas for improvement in transparency and compliance.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

8*****@medihub.lvI

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS likely enabled but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, and no security certifications are displayed. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, but privacy compliance is minimal. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for significant improvements in policy transparency and technical safeguards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

MEDIHUB

Description:

Reģistrējieties uz pirmo bezmaksas vizīti vadošajā estētikas klīnikā MEDIHUB. Mēs rūpējamies par katru klientu - laipni lūgti.

Key Services:
esthetic skin treatmentsconsultationsfree first visit registration
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptVue.jsNuxt.jsGoogle Tag Manager
Frameworks:
Vue.jsNuxt.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:zebracloud.com include:spf.titan.email include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.google.com include:mailgun.org ip4:185.58.64.0/22 ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 86 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:75.2.60.5
Name Servers:
ns1.serveriai.ltDNS only
ns2.serveriai.ltDNS only
ns3.serveriai.ltDNS only
ns4.serveriai.ltDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx1.titan.email
SOA:Serial: 2025011100, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:304ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:zebracloud.com include:spf.titan.email include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.google.com include:mailgun.org ip4:185.58.64.0/22 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks Vue.js and Nuxt.js, indicating a contemporary front-end architecture. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and tracking purposes. The site appears to be moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with responsive design elements. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or hosting provider from the HTML content. The lack of visible security headers and privacy policies suggests technical debt in security and compliance areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a functional and professional website but requires enhancements in security and privacy implementations.
Analyze Another Website