Skip to main content

Is megasoft.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA MegaSoft Reviews

megasoft.lv favicon

Is megasoft.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA MegaSoft

Check if megasoft.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyLatviasmall
jQueryPhotoSwipe
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 4:17:31 AM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIA MegaSoft is a Latvian small-sized technology company specializing in professional website and internet store development. Their services include website creation, e-commerce programming, hosting, domain acquisition, content creation, logo design, and Google AdWords marketing. The company targets businesses and individuals seeking quick, quality, and guaranteed web solutions within the Latvian market. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and relevant content, supporting a positive user experience and moderate SEO optimization. Technically, the website employs jQuery and PhotoSwipe libraries, uses HTTPS, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site shows basic mobile optimization and accessibility features but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or terms of service pages. The contact form collects user data via POST method and includes a minimal cookie consent mechanism. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates moderate security posture with HTTPS usage and secure form submission but lacks comprehensive security headers and privacy policies. No vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Detected Technologies

jQueryPhotoSwipe

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

MegaSoft operates as a local Latvian web development service provider with a clear focus on delivering fast and quality websites and online stores. Their transparent pricing and service guarantees position them competitively in the small business segment. The company leverages Google AdWords for marketing and Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a digital marketing strategy. The absence of privacy and terms policies suggests an opportunity to improve compliance and customer trust. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified. The business model is service-oriented with direct client engagement through contact forms and phone/email communication.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@megasoft.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712039****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website's security maturity is moderate. HTTPS is implemented, and forms use POST methods, reducing risk of data interception. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options weakens defense against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. Cookie consent is minimal but present. The lack of WHOIS data limits assessment of domain registration legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and safe but could improve its security posture by adopting best practices and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA MegaSoft

Description:

Mājas lapas izstrāde, interneta veikala programmēšana. Ātri. Kvalitatīvi. Ar garantiju.

Key Services:
Website developmentInternet store developmentHostingDomain acquisitionContent creation and placementLogo designGoogle AdWords
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryPhotoSwipe
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage implied by og:url (https://megasoft.lv/sakums)
  • Form uses POST method

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Google AdWords
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a ptr include:gmail.com -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 67 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:81.94.233.3
Name Servers:
pns11.cloudns.netDNS only
pns12.cloudns.netDNS only
pns13.cloudns.netDNS only
pns14.cloudns.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.megasoft.lv
SOA:Serial: 2023090608, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:195ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a ptr include:gmail.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a lightweight tech stack with jQuery and PhotoSwipe for UI components. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics. The site is built with standard HTML5 and CSS, with no detected CMS or complex frameworks. Performance is moderate with some optimization potential. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The site lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or terms pages, indicating technical debt in compliance and security best practices. Hosting provider and domain registrar details are unavailable due to WHOIS query limits.
Analyze Another Website