Skip to main content

Is mehanoid.pro a Scam? Security Check Results - mehanoid.pro Reviews

mehanoid.pro favicon

Is mehanoid.pro Safe? Security Analysis for Главная - Mehanoid.pro

Check if mehanoid.pro is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Materialize CSSGoogle FontsjQuery (implied by Materialize)WordPress (implied by wp-content paths)
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 5:23:52 PM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website mehanoid.pro appears to be a small business or project established in 2018, hosted on Beget and built on WordPress with Materialize CSS framework. The site content is accessible and primarily in Russian, but lacks critical compliance documents such as privacy policy, cookie policy, and terms of service. There is no visible contact information or incident response details, which limits user trust and compliance with regulations like GDPR. Technically, the site uses modern front-end frameworks but lacks security headers and advanced security configurations. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate with no privacy protection, indicating transparency in ownership. Overall, the website shows basic digital maturity but requires significant improvements in privacy, security, and business credibility to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

Materialize CSSGoogle FontsjQuery (implied by Materialize)WordPress (implied by wp-content paths)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business behind mehanoid.pro is not clearly identified from the content or metadata. The domain age and hosting suggest a stable small business or personal project. The absence of contact details and compliance policies limits its credibility and market positioning. The site likely targets Russian-speaking users interested in technology or related services, but the business model and revenue streams are unclear. No partnerships or certifications are evident, indicating a standalone operation with limited external validation.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

t*****@mehanoid.pro
k*****@gmail.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security posture is minimal with no detected security headers, no HTTPS enforcement details, and no incident response contacts. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The site should implement standard security best practices including HTTPS, security headers, and clear privacy and incident response policies to reduce risk and improve user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Materialize CSSGoogle FontsjQuery (implied by Materialize)WordPress (implied by wp-content paths)
Frameworks:
Materialize
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:beget.com include:spf.unisender.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 74 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
7 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(194 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:185.19.204.243
Name Servers:
ns1.beget.com
ns1.beget.pro
ns2.beget.com
ns2.beget.pro
MX Records:
10: mx1.beget.com
20: mx2.beget.com
SOA:Serial: 1678985113, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:84ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:beget.com include:spf.unisender.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress CMS with Materialize CSS framework and custom fonts. Hosting is provided by Beget, a common provider for small to medium websites. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a basic SEO setup. However, no advanced analytics or tracking tools were detected. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but no optimizations like CDN or caching were identified. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The technical stack is modern but lacks security hardening and compliance features.
Analyze Another Website