Skip to main content

Is memberclicks.net a Scam? Security Check Results - memberclicks.net Reviews

M

Is memberclicks.net Safe? Security Analysis for 400 Bad Request

Check if memberclicks.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/a
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 4:30:41 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at memberclicks.net is currently inaccessible, returning an HTTP 400 Bad Request error with minimal HTML content. This prevents any meaningful extraction of business, security, or compliance information from the site itself. The domain is well aged, registered since 2000 with eNom, LLC, and uses Cloudflare name servers, indicating a legitimate and established presence. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of accessible content limits the ability to assess the company's digital maturity or security posture. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are detectable, nor are there any contact details or business descriptions available on the page. The site does not appear to be behind a WAF or security challenge, but the error page suggests a client-side request issue or misconfiguration.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the inaccessible website content, no direct business intelligence can be derived. The domain age and registrar suggest a stable business entity, but no information about market positioning, services, or partnerships is available. The absence of metadata, structured data, or external links further limits insights into the company's operations or ecosystem.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture cannot be fully evaluated due to lack of accessible content and headers. The domain uses Cloudflare DNS but does not have DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security shortfall. No security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosures are found. The site does not present any visible security best practices or headers. The 400 error page indicates potential configuration issues that should be addressed to restore proper service and enable security assessments.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Resolve the HTTP 400 Bad Request error to restore website accessibility.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to HTTP 400 Bad Request error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:204.193.139.30 ip4:159.135.231.71 ip4:204.193.139.31 ip4:204.193.139.33 ip4:209.235.234.1 ip4:209.235.234.2 include:mailgun.org include:emailsrvr.com -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 56 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:memberclicks.net
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/29/2025 (56 days)
SANs:memberclicks.net, *.memberclicks.net

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
25 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(192 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.17.141.104, 104.17.138.104, 104.17.137.104, 104.17.140.104, 104.17.139.104
AAAA Records:2606:4700::6811:8968, 2606:4700::6811:8b68, 2606:4700::6811:8d68, 2606:4700::6811:8a68, 2606:4700::6811:8c68
Name Servers:
igor.ns.cloudflare.com
vita.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: mx1.emailsrvr.com
20: mx2.emailsrvr.com
SOA:Serial: 2384990440, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:144ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:204.193.139.30 ip4:159.135.231.71 ip4:204.193.139.31 ip4:204.193.139.33 ip4:209.235.234.1 ip4:209.235.234.2 include:mailgun.org include:emailsrvr.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves only a minimal error page with no metadata, scripts, or content. The domain is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC. No CMS or technology stack can be identified. The lack of accessible content prevents evaluation of performance, mobile optimization, or SEO. The site requires technical remediation to restore functionality and enable further analysis.
Analyze Another Website