Skip to main content

Is meowrpc.com a Scam? Security Check Results - meowrpc.com Reviews

meowrpc.com favicon

Is meowrpc.com Safe? Security Analysis for MeowRPC

Check if meowrpc.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:44:25 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

MeowRPC is a small blockchain technology service focused on providing frontrunning protection and MEV hunting capabilities primarily for BNB and other blockchain networks. The website presents basic content describing its niche service offering targeted at blockchain developers and crypto traders interested in transaction protection. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies with Cloudflare DNS hosting and Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the site lacks comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts its compliance posture. Security-wise, HTTPS is enabled, but the absence of security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement. Overall, the website is functional but basic, with moderate trustworthiness and business credibility.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the blockchain technology sector, targeting a niche market of MEV hunters and blockchain users seeking frontrunning protection. The business model appears to be service-oriented, offering RPC endpoints and protection services. The domain age and WHOIS data are consistent with a startup launched in 2023. The lack of contact information and formal policies may limit customer trust and regulatory compliance. The use of Google Tag Manager indicates some marketing and analytics efforts. No partnerships or certifications are evident from the website content. Growth potential exists given the emerging nature of MEV protection services, but the company should enhance transparency and compliance to strengthen market position.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which may hinder incident handling and user trust. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the content. The security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security and privacy policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to improve compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

MeowRPC is a blockchain-related service promoting frontrunning protection and MEV hunting for BNB and other chains.

Key Services:
frontrunning protectionMEV hunting supportRPC services for BNB and other chains
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerCloudflare DNS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

22/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 88 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.70.45, 104.26.11.181, 104.26.10.181
Name Servers:
marvin.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
sofia.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2382478202, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:260ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript technologies with Google Tag Manager for analytics. Hosting is via Cloudflare DNS with domain registration at NameCheap. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no structured JSON-LD data found. The absence of a CMS suggests a custom or static site. Technical debt appears low but the lack of security headers and compliance policies indicates areas for modernization and risk mitigation.
Analyze Another Website