Skip to main content

Is meslojumi.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - meslojumi.lv Reviews

M

Is meslojumi.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Visitor anti-robot validation

Check if meslojumi.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerreCAPTCHA v2
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:03:56 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website meslojumi.lv currently serves a security CAPTCHA challenge page powered by BitNinja, blocking direct access to its content. This indicates the site is protected by a Web Application Firewall (WAF) to mitigate automated or malicious traffic. Due to this blocking, no business or product information is accessible, and WHOIS data retrieval failed due to query limits. The site uses outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5), which are known to have multiple security vulnerabilities. The presence of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager indicates some level of user tracking, but no privacy or cookie policies are present, raising compliance concerns. Overall, the site’s security posture is limited by outdated software and lack of visible security headers, but the WAF challenge provides some protection against abuse.

Detected Technologies

Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerreCAPTCHA v2

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No explicit business information, contact details, or corporate identifiers are available on the accessible page. The site appears to be a protected gateway rather than a public-facing business site. The lack of privacy policies, terms of service, or contact information limits trust and credibility. The use of BitNinja WAF suggests the site owner is concerned about security threats. Without further data, no market positioning or business model insights can be derived.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site employs BitNinja WAF with CAPTCHA challenge to block suspicious traffic, which is a positive security control. However, the underlying CMS platforms are severely outdated, exposing the site to known vulnerabilities. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement details are visible in the provided content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps. The security score is low due to these factors, and the site would benefit from CMS upgrades, security header implementation, and comprehensive privacy compliance measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade Joomla and WordPress CMS to current supported versions to eliminate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

BitNinja Detected

The website is presenting a BitNinja CAPTCHA challenge page blocking access until CAPTCHA is solved, indicating a WAF or security filtering mechanism is active.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

This page is a security CAPTCHA challenge page designed to block automated or malicious traffic. It does not provide business or product information.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerreCAPTCHA v2
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked by a BitNinja CAPTCHA security challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:89.149.219.49 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:212.7.207.87 ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 63 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:89.149.219.49
Name Servers:
ns1.areait.lvDNS only
ns2.areait.lvDNS only
ns3.areait.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: meslojumi.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025070401, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:209ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:89.149.219.49 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:212.7.207.87 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The site uses legacy CMS platforms Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, both of which are outdated and unsupported, posing significant security risks. The presence of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts indicates standard web analytics usage. The site is protected by BitNinja WAF, which presents a CAPTCHA challenge to visitors, effectively blocking automated access. The page is minimally designed with basic CSS resets and inline styles. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. No advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries are detected. The site lacks SEO optimization and structured data markup. Overall, the technical infrastructure is dated and requires modernization.
Analyze Another Website