Skip to main content

Is mestopodpalcem.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - Město pod palcem Reviews

M

Is mestopodpalcem.cz Safe? Security Analysis for Město pod palcem

Check if mestopodpalcem.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentCzech Republicmedium
WordPress 5.3.18jQuery 1.12.4Bootstrap CSSFont AwesomeGoogle Fonts+4 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:17:24 PM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Město pod palcem is a comprehensive communication platform designed to facilitate rapid and dynamic interaction between municipalities and their citizens in the Czech Republic. The platform offers a modular system including mobile applications, issue reporting, surveys, payment processing, public transport information, and integration with existing city IT systems. It is well-established with multiple municipal clients and positive testimonials, positioning it as a trusted solution in the government technology sector. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern but somewhat dated technology stack including Bootstrap and jQuery. The site is mobile-optimized and features standard web technologies and plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection. SEO and accessibility are adequately addressed, though some improvements could be made in security headers and updating libraries. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA on forms, but lacks explicit security headers and uses an outdated jQuery version that may expose it to vulnerabilities. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency and trust slightly, though the business references and content quality support legitimacy. Privacy compliance is partially met with a privacy policy linked externally but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website presents a professional and credible front for a government-focused technology service, with moderate technical maturity and some security improvements recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 5.3.18jQuery 1.12.4Bootstrap CSSFont AwesomeGoogle FontsContact Form 7Owl CarouseljQuery ConfirmGoogle reCAPTCHA

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Město pod palcem operates primarily in the government sector, providing municipalities with a digital communication platform that enhances citizen engagement and municipal service delivery. Its business model is B2G, focusing on modular software solutions that integrate with existing city IT infrastructure. The company Eternal s.r.o. is the parent entity, with a strong presence in the Czech municipal market, evidenced by multiple client references and awards. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive feature set, modularity, and integration capabilities. Growth indicators include ongoing updates, new municipal clients, and positive user feedback. The partnership ecosystem includes media outlets and municipal websites that promote the platform. Strategic observations suggest focusing on security enhancements and expanding privacy compliance to maintain market leadership.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

+4207366*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version introduces potential vulnerabilities, and the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options weakens defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms and incomplete privacy compliance could expose the organization to regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, while basic security practices are in place, there is room for improvement in library updates, header implementation, and formal security documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Město pod palcem

Description:

Město pod palcem je nejucelenější řešení pro komunikaci mezi městem a občany. Komplexní systém fungující jako komunikační platforma a agregátor informací.

Key Services:
Mobile application for citizen communicationIssue reporting (fotografování závad)Surveys and pollsOnline payment of municipal feesPublic transport infoMaps and guidesNotificationsContact directoriesIntegration with city IT systems
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 5.3.18jQuery 1.12.4Bootstrap CSSFont AwesomeGoogle FontsContact Form 7Owl CarouseljQuery ConfirmGoogle reCAPTCHA
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WebMobile (Android and iOS apps referenced)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing Tools:
Google FontsFont Awesome
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professionally designed municipal communication platform.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
\v=spf1 ip4:109.72.0.214 include:amazonses.com ~all\
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:postmaster@eternal.cz
Forensic Reports:postmaster@eternal.cz
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 52 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Invalid SPF Record

MEDIUM

SPF record syntax is invalid

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:89.221.213.96
Name Servers:
ns.wedos.com
ns.wedos.czDNS only
ns.wedos.eu
ns.wedos.net
MX Records:
1: wes1-mx1.wedos.net
10: wes1-mx-backup.wedos.net
1: wes1-mx2.wedos.net
SOA:Serial: 2025072702, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:95ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
\v=spf1 ip4:109.72.0.214 include:amazonses.com ~all\

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 5.3.18 with a combination of Bootstrap, Font Awesome, and jQuery 1.12.4. It uses common plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Owl Carousel for UI components and user interaction. The site is mobile responsive and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of some scripts like Google reCAPTCHA. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version and lack of modern security headers indicate technical debt and potential security risks. SEO is supported by All In One SEO Pack and structured data in JSON-LD format. The site lacks advanced performance optimizations such as HTTP/2 push or extensive caching headers visible in the HTML source. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but would benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Analyze Another Website