Skip to main content

Is meta.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Meta Reviews

meta.com favicon

Is meta.com Safe? Security Analysis for Meta

Check if meta.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/aenterprise
ReactJavaScriptCSSHTML5Facebook SDK+2 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 1:47:25 AM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Meta is a leading global technology company primarily known for its social media platforms and virtual reality products. The analyzed website serves as a storefront for Meta's products and services but requires user authentication to access content, limiting public visibility. The site employs modern web technologies including React and various Facebook SDKs, indicating a mature technical infrastructure. However, the lack of accessible content and absence of public privacy or cookie policies reduce transparency and user trust. Security posture appears basic with SSL enabled but missing advanced security headers and no visible incident response or security policies. Overall, the site is legitimate but restricted, with room for improvement in public transparency and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

ReactJavaScriptCSSHTML5Facebook SDKMeta PixelGraphQL

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Meta holds a dominant position in the technology sector with a business model focused on social media, virtual reality hardware, and software sales. The website targets general consumers and business users interested in Meta's products. The extensive use of tracking pixels and advertising networks suggests a strong marketing and analytics ecosystem. However, the lack of publicly accessible contact information and policies may hinder user trust. Meta's global scale and enterprise size are evident, but the website's limited public content restricts deeper business insights.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which are recommended for enhanced protection. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected from the provided data. The site relies on third-party scripts and tracking pixels, which require regular auditing to prevent supply chain risks. The absence of public security policies or incident response contacts indicates a gap in transparency. Overall, the security posture is basic and could benefit from improved header configurations and public security disclosures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

The website content is blocked behind a login wall requiring Meta account authentication. The WHOIS query returned no match indicating possible privacy protection or domain registry restrictions.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Company:

Meta

Description:

Meta is a technology company focusing on social media platforms and virtual reality products. The website is a storefront for Meta products and services.

Key Services:
Social media platformsVirtual reality hardware and softwareOnline account management
Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactJavaScriptCSSHTML5Facebook SDKMeta PixelGraphQL
Frameworks:
React
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMeta PixelLinkedIn InsightPinterest Ads PixelReddit PixelSnapchat PixelTikTok Analytics PixelTwitter Analytics Pixel
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google DoubleClickFacebook Audience Network
Tracking Pixels:
Meta PixelLinkedIn InsightPinterest Ads PixelReddit PixelSnapchat PixelTikTok Analytics PixelTwitter Analytics Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Salesforce ChatTealium CDN
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible without login, limiting analysis.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

90/100
Score

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0"

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google Ads

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 redirect=_spf.fb.com
DNS Lookups:0/10
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:a@dmarc.facebookmail.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

85/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 7 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.meta.com
Issuer:DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Valid Until:9/12/2025 (7 days)
SANs:*.meta.com, meta.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
34 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(3060 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:157.240.205.1
AAAA Records:2a03:2880:f013:0:face:b00c:0:2
Name Servers:
a.ns.facebook.com
b.ns.facebook.com
c.ns.facebook.com
d.ns.facebook.com
MX Records:
10: mxb-00082601.gslb.pphosted.com
10: mxa-00082601.gslb.pphosted.com
SOA:Serial: 4207849484, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:42ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 redirect=_spf.fb.com

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using React and modern JavaScript frameworks, leveraging Facebook SDKs and GraphQL APIs. It loads multiple external scripts and stylesheets from Facebook's CDN infrastructure. Performance is moderate with some optimization potential. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but could be improved. The site is hosted on a robust platform but content is gated behind login, limiting public technical assessment. No CMS was detected. The technical stack is modern but requires enhancements in security and privacy implementations.
Analyze Another Website